Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to implement point cloud supervision? #36

Open
CleanSeaSalt opened this issue Oct 20, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

How to implement point cloud supervision? #36

CleanSeaSalt opened this issue Oct 20, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@CleanSeaSalt
Copy link

hello,Thanks much for such an excellent work!
I saw that the paper mentioned that the supervision results of adding point clouds were analyzed. I would like to ask for some ideas or methods to implement point cloud supervision. Thank you!
image
image

@yanglei18
Copy link
Collaborator

This codebase follows the same organizational structure as BEVDepth. Please refer to the specific implementation of BEVDepth for details.

@CleanSeaSalt
Copy link
Author

OK
I used “/scripts/data_converter/visual_tools.py ”to generate some ground truth, but there are some obvious errors, such as :
image
image
What step went wrong?Thanks!

@CleanSeaSalt
Copy link
Author

Hello, I would like to ask what the histogram drawn in section 3.1 of the paper, the horizontal axis range [-1,2], means? Does it mean the height of the horizontal plane where the radar is located as the reference? That is to say converted to [5,7]?
image
image

@CleanSeaSalt
Copy link
Author

Hello, I have done a lot of experiments with reference to the supervision method of BEVDepth (point clouds are projected onto pictures, through minimum pooling and one hot encoding), but they cannot exceed the unsupervised results. I would like to ask about the one hot encoding part. Isn't it wrong that a discrete distribution should be set?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants