Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

misc Fast USDC improvements #11049

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 27, 2025
Merged

misc Fast USDC improvements #11049

merged 6 commits into from
Feb 27, 2025

Conversation

turadg
Copy link
Member

@turadg turadg commented Feb 25, 2025

incidental

Description

Mostly extracted from #11025

Security Considerations

none

Scaling Considerations

none

Documentation Considerations

none

Testing Considerations

CI suffices

Upgrade Considerations

No upgrade test yet. #11025 has that and is in flight.

Copy link

cloudflare-workers-and-pages bot commented Feb 25, 2025

Deploying agoric-sdk with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: 1477c17
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://4164afd7.agoric-sdk.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://ta-fu-misc.agoric-sdk.pages.dev

View logs

@turadg turadg changed the title misc Fast USDC improvements deprecate blockTimestamp Feb 25, 2025
@turadg turadg requested review from dckc and samsiegart February 25, 2025 19:33
@turadg turadg marked this pull request as ready for review February 25, 2025 19:33
@turadg turadg requested a review from a team as a code owner February 25, 2025 19:33
@turadg turadg marked this pull request as draft February 25, 2025 20:16
@turadg
Copy link
Member Author

turadg commented Feb 25, 2025

Dropping this to draft because forgoing blockTimestamp has more bad ramifications than I expected. It's worth querying the RPC node and given the low precision requirements it can be imputed from infrequent queries

Copy link
Member

@dckc dckc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just acknowledging the request for review to get it off my queue

we've been discussing this internally...

@turadg turadg changed the title deprecate blockTimestamp misc Fast USDC improvements Feb 27, 2025
@turadg turadg requested a review from dckc February 27, 2025 01:27
@turadg turadg marked this pull request as ready for review February 27, 2025 01:27
@turadg turadg added the force:integration Force integration tests to run on PR label Feb 27, 2025
Comment on lines +220 to +222
lastEvidence,
'!=',
next,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we have the operator ids handy at this point?
It would be nice to know which evidence comes from which operator.
I think it's not hard to find from a few earlier log messages, though.

@turadg turadg added the automerge:rebase Automatically rebase updates, then merge label Feb 27, 2025
@mergify mergify bot merged commit 214eb2a into master Feb 27, 2025
88 checks passed
@mergify mergify bot deleted the ta/fu-misc branch February 27, 2025 03:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge:rebase Automatically rebase updates, then merge force:integration Force integration tests to run on PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants