Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Are there any ways to save intermediate images at 512*512? #31

Open
TakutoNamba opened this issue Mar 29, 2023 · 6 comments
Open

Are there any ways to save intermediate images at 512*512? #31

TakutoNamba opened this issue Mar 29, 2023 · 6 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@TakutoNamba
Copy link

I'd appreciate if you have any ideas how you could do it! (Also how exactly does Image creation progress preview mode affect their size?)

@AlUlkesh AlUlkesh added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 29, 2023
@AlUlkesh
Copy link
Owner

Well, I could implement a scaling option. But what is your use case? Do you really want 512x512 or rather the larger side be 512 and the smaller side sized accordingly? So for example a 1536x768 would become a 512x256.

@AlUlkesh
Copy link
Owner

As for the preview mode. If for example you set any of the lower quality, faster preview options:

image

then the intermediates would also be of this lower quality.

@ComproLoper
Copy link

As for the preview mode. If for example you set any of the lower quality, faster preview options:

image

then the intermediates would also be of this lower quality.

This was it for me, setting it to "Full" saves the preview images at their full size, thanks!

@TakutoNamba
Copy link
Author

@AlUlkesh
Ohhh didn't realize that option, and now it is working as I wanted. Thank you for the tip!

@rbfussell
Copy link

What you should do is poll the setting and redtext in the menu a warning if it is set below full. Don't not work, but make it clear that they need to adjust it in 99% of the cases.

@CVL1971
Copy link

CVL1971 commented Jun 6, 2023

When using the batch option of imgToimg, it seems that there is some kind of name conflict, the result is that after each generation of an image, when moving to the next one, the new intermediate images replace and delete the old ones. It would be very interesting to keep the original behavior, one folder for each generation since all the batch images go to the same folder.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants