We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hey, when I was about to download the new version and looked at the different builds I remembered that I read somewhere that FX 6300s IPC performance of some AVX instructions in some scenarios is worse than some previous iterations in f.e. SSE4. And sure enough I found this here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60172943/why-using-avx-ymmm256-instructions-is-4-times-slower-than-xmmm128
Now, I'm not an expert or even amateur programmer, but do you know if the SSE4 builds are faster on an FX 6300?
I figure you had one, at least at some point: RobRich999/Chromium_Clang#26 (comment)
Sorry for stalking you about a decade old CPU.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Hey, when I was about to download the new version and looked at the different builds I remembered that I read somewhere that FX 6300s IPC performance of some AVX instructions in some scenarios is worse than some previous iterations in f.e. SSE4. And sure enough I found this here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60172943/why-using-avx-ymmm256-instructions-is-4-times-slower-than-xmmm128
Now, I'm not an expert or even amateur programmer, but do you know if the SSE4 builds are faster on an FX 6300?
I figure you had one, at least at some point: RobRich999/Chromium_Clang#26 (comment)
Sorry for stalking you about a decade old CPU.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: