Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Questions and Clarifications Regarding Cognac Code #6

Open
Deblusantos opened this issue Mar 3, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Questions and Clarifications Regarding Cognac Code #6

Deblusantos opened this issue Mar 3, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@Deblusantos
Copy link

Currently, I am engaged in research in the field of plant bacteriology, and during my investigations, I had the privilege of discovering and exploring Cognac, a tool developed by your team. I carefully read the associated article, and I must say that I am particularly impressed with the taxonomic approach that Cognac offers.

However, while attempting to implement some modifications in the code provided on GitHub, I encountered some challenges and would appreciate your guidance on specific points.

Firstly, I am interested in modifying the parameters related to the presence of marker genes. According to the understanding of the article and the potential flexibility of adjustable parameters in the tool, I aim to ensure the presence of marker genes in 100% of genomes, setting the "coreGeneThresh" parameter to 1. Similarly, I seek to ensure that genes are present in a single copy in 100% of genomes, establishing the "copyNumTresh" parameter as 0. Despite my efforts, I face difficulties incorporating these modifications and am having trouble obtaining the gene concatenation file.

Another issue I would like to address is related to phylogeny. In the article, I noticed the possibility of using the Maximum Likelihood (ML) methodology instead of Neighbor Joining (NJ) to infer the phylogenetic tree. Although I managed to obtain the NJ tree with the provided default code, I encountered challenges in implementing the necessary settings for the ML methodology. If possible, I would appreciate your guidance or suggestions on how to proceed in this regard.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant