Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[@azure/cosmos] Deprecate older changefeed iterator #32650

Open
amanrao23 opened this issue Jan 22, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

[@azure/cosmos] Deprecate older changefeed iterator #32650

amanrao23 opened this issue Jan 22, 2025 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@amanrao23
Copy link
Member

Deprecate the older changeFeed Iterator (items.changeFeed()) in favour of new items.getChangeFeedIterator() introduced in CosmosDB v4 SDK.

@amanrao23 amanrao23 added this to the 4.0.0 GA milestone Jan 22, 2025
@amanrao23 amanrao23 self-assigned this Jan 22, 2025
@amanrao23 amanrao23 moved this to In Review in @azure/cosmos Project Jan 22, 2025
amanrao23 added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 29, 2025
### Packages impacted by this PR
@azure/cosmos

### Issues associated with this PR
#32650

### Describe the problem that is addressed by this PR
This PR deprecates the older `changeFeed` iterator in favor of the newer
`getChangeFeedIterator` method.

### What are the possible designs available to address the problem? If
there are more than one possible design, why was the one in this PR
chosen?


### Are there test cases added in this PR? _(If not, why?)_
N/A

### Provide a list of related PRs _(if any)_


### Command used to generate this PR:**_(Applicable only to SDK release
request PRs)_

### Checklists
- [ ] Added impacted package name to the issue description
- [ ] Does this PR needs any fixes in the SDK Generator?** _(If so,
create an Issue in the
[Autorest/typescript](https://github.com/Azure/autorest.typescript)
repository and link it here)_
- [ ] Added a changelog (if necessary)

Co-authored-by: Aman <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: In Review
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant