Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Options for setting "nominal" weight in analysis tab #18

Open
SigmaRelief opened this issue May 6, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Options for setting "nominal" weight in analysis tab #18

SigmaRelief opened this issue May 6, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@SigmaRelief
Copy link

On the analysis tab, assuming 0% based only on the 2mm/s rate for a particular temperature underestimates the underextrusion at low temps. In a multi temp series, setting the baseline to the highest observed weight (probably the slow hot blob) may give better absolute numbers. This is trivial to add in Excel, but many users probably don't check the underlying formulas.

An option to fill in measured weight from a 200mm length of filament could also be an interesting addition even if there are better calibration tests for dialing in the last few percent of flow multiplier for real world performance.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant