Dynamic Smagorinsky on HPC #4104
Unanswered
SamDeAbreu
asked this question in
Computational science!
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
I think we never understood why that compilation wasn't working on sverdrup. When we switched to using Github's machines (#3926) it worked pretty well, so I think compiling the dynamic coefficient is just too much for some machines... ? That said, it takes a looong time to compile. How long have you waited for before throwing in the towel? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi all,
I see that there has been development by @tomchor and others on a Smagorinsky closure but with a dynamic coefficient, which is amazing! I've been able to run the directionally-averaged version locally, but run into issues when running it on my school's HPC (version 0.95.10). Specifically, the code stalls on building the nonhydrostatic model.
It appears this is a known issue (#3642 (comment)) when it was being tested on a server. I was wondering if the cause has been determined yet? Or if we're still not sure?
Thanks,
Sam
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions