You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
CycleGAN proposes a way to match two unpaired and distinct datasets (i.e. landscape photos and Monet paintings) to train a GAN that maps the two datasets.
Pros:
makes lines smooth, works well, potentially higher quality for end-user use?
much more interesting to implement
Cons:
doesn't strictly follow the edges of the input image (could also be a pro? less accurate sketches for a better overall picture)
needs a diverse dataset and to train the models (pretrained weights not provided, dataset trained on is just faces)
needs both a dataset of images and a dataset of sketches
Assessment:
Stick to Canny for now, can view CycleGAN in the future? Could be much more work but is more interesting
Can also look into deep-learning based methods for edge detection like TEED, interesting results in Github and pretrained weights provided
Task at Hand
Look into CycleGAN as a potential replacement for Canny edge detection. Figure out how this would fit into our project.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: