Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: Schedular sequential toggle & Conditional improvments #1284

Open
1 task done
ShadowolfVFX opened this issue Jan 25, 2025 · 0 comments
Open
1 task done
Labels
enhancement New features or enhancements to existing ones

Comments

@ShadowolfVFX
Copy link

ShadowolfVFX commented Jan 25, 2025

I confirm that

  • I have searched for an existing feature request matching the description.

Feature Description

Hi, I've been using AMP for a probably about a year now, not had any troubles with it functionally that weren't caused by me. I started a Valheim server recently and wanted to do some more in depth stuff regarding AMP's schedular such as automatic restarts, automatic updates and backups. The actual functions are fine but I'm also using your send messages to Discord function. There's 2 things that I struggled with. And I have a solution for you for both.

For these, i'll be referencing my Stream bot called Mix it up as a visual reference. It has the layout and functions I believe would benifit AMP's schedular.

  1. Process list in order. Have a little toggle on every task that says wait for completion before moving on. IE if you had a timer schedular to send a message, check for update, and then restart, once restarts completed send a message. If i'd check this toggle on restart it would send the message check for update restart THEN post the second message.

Image

  1. Nested Conditional Statements / Multiple conditional Statements / Different resolve methods • Right now i'm using the "Applcation State changed" for my ready event. The reason i'm using a conditional statement is because I only wanted to send a restart and ready event, not anything inbetween. The problem is once 1 conditional statement is done, another can't be, at least from my testing. So my suggestion is adding what actions you would like to complete inside the conditional statement instead of under it. Additonally to this, have AND/OR/XOR resolve methods, and the ability to add multiple clauses. This functionally gives the end user the ability to do whatever they need.

Image

I appreciate you taking the time to read my ramblings, and keep up the great work

@ShadowolfVFX ShadowolfVFX added the enhancement New features or enhancements to existing ones label Jan 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New features or enhancements to existing ones
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant