Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
@IgorPelevanyuk and @adriansev As you seem to be using COMDIRAC, do you have any opinion on this ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Hi! Not really, my use-case for dinit was just |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Implemented in: #6961 (will go in v8.1 onwards) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi,
This is mainly a question for @atsareg initially...
As part of the COMDIRAC v8r1 cleanup we've been asked to remove dinit if possible... The current workflow for a COMDIRAC as I understand it is:
dinit <profile_name>
, profile_name is usually the DIRAC group, but doesn't have to be.Our suggested new workflow is:
dirac-proxy-init -g <dirac_group>
to get a proxy, no immediate session initialisation happens.We would probably also remove all references to DCOMMANDS_PPID environment variable as it isn't clear to me that anyone is using that now: It isn't set in any of the current bashrc/diracosrc init files any more, so all of the commands fall back to just auto-detecting the PPID.
This would mean that there would no longer be any custom profiles: You'd have one profile per DIRAC group that you use. Does that sound reasonable to you?
Regards,
Simon
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions