You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
How should we deal with that? Should we only use the main location? Or rather use all the locations that we can get - is there a consistent approach that can be applied for the different states (Bundesländer)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think its about how we define a school. In other states there are often multiple schools with the same location. I think we should save all the locations of the school in an array and tag the main location. Then, we could decide later, when for example putting the schools on map, whether we want multiple pins for one school
In Berlin we have both situation: 1 school on different locations and multiple schools on 1 location. Plus while renovating school building some schools move the location temporary for years.
Sometimes the administration publish building numbers:
How about:
add build number (may be 0..9 or 'a' to 'z')
define a build number as main building
sub building only define values to overwrite the values from main building (e.g. address)
As of c3cacde, schools can have multiple locations. For example, the "Stadtteilschule Helmuth Hübener" is located in
HH-5043-0
, main location) andHH-5043-1
, secondary location)The main location apparently always ends in
-0
.How should we deal with that? Should we only use the main location? Or rather use all the locations that we can get - is there a consistent approach that can be applied for the different states (Bundesländer)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: