We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Fix wording
Add a note about the simple bfb tag
Fix link
Add some development guidance Based on suggestions from Stefanie Falk and Sunniva Indrehus
Add issue label: "tag: large"
Add notes on 'enh: new science' label
Rename 'enh - major new science' to 'enh - new science' This was requested by Will Wieder and Dave Lawrence: They wanted this label to encompass a greater range of issues so they could easily find the issues that involve new scientific capabilities, whether major or more minor.
Rename 'invalid' to 'non-issue' This sounds nicer, especially to people from the outside community who report issues.
Document the new 'type: -external' label
Include PRs in searches for next and high priority items
Fix a few more lowercase ctsm references for consistency
Change ESCOMP/ctsm to ESCOMP/CTSM Now that we have renamed the repo to ESCOMP/CTSM Most or all of these changes shouldn't be necessary, but it keeps things more self-consistent.
Updated Issue Labels and Issue Management (markdown)
more symmetry
Change search: Only add issues, not PRs, to high priority board
Give a link for searching for high priority issues not on the board This will make the weekly review process easier: can just click this link rather than following instructions.
Make table of contents label smaller
Add table of contents Generated with gh-md-toc Issue-Labels-and-Issue-Management.md then edited slightly.
Make text bold
Add a few more notes
Add notes on our weekly issue review/triage process
Reorder Issue-Labels-and-Issue-Management The issue management piece seems more important, so I'm putting it first
Rename Issue-Labels to Issue-Labels-and-Issue-Management