Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add mappings to FOAF, PROV, PAV #2

Open
stain opened this issue Apr 22, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

Add mappings to FOAF, PROV, PAV #2

stain opened this issue Apr 22, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@stain
Copy link
Contributor

stain commented Apr 22, 2016

When looking at JERM I see that it defines many terms in its own namespace, even if they are available in commonly used ontologies, e.g.

jerm:Person -> foaf:Person, prov:Person
jerm:Investigation -> isaterms:investigation
jerm:hasCreator -> pav:createdBy / pav:authoredBy, dcterms:creator, prov:wasAttributedTo
jerm:hasContributor -> pav:contributedBy, dcterms:contributor, prov:wasAttributedTo
jerm:hasFormat -> dcterms:hasFormat
jerm:isFormatOf -> dcterms:isFormatOf
jerm:hasPart -> dcterms:hasPart

While I might disagree with redefining all of these in your own namespace I can see why if you want to be more specific in their domain and ranges. I would at least hope for a mapping to the more common ontologies. :)

For details:

http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/
http://purl.org/pav/html and http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2041-1480-4-37
http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/
http://purl.org/dc/terms/
http://isa-tools.github.io/linkedISA/ and https://github.com/ISA-tools/linkedISA-ontologies/blob/master/isaterms.owl

@stuzart
Copy link
Member

stuzart commented Apr 25, 2016

Thanks Stian. We are currently working on a new version of the ontology, and these kinds of mappings are something we plan to incorporate.

stain added a commit to stain/JERMOntology that referenced this issue Oct 12, 2017
stain added a commit to stain/JERMOntology that referenced this issue Oct 12, 2017
stain added a commit to stain/JERMOntology that referenced this issue Oct 12, 2017
@stain
Copy link
Contributor Author

stain commented Nov 20, 2017

Thanks for merging #4 - remaining would be ISATerm #5 and dcterms - I'll have a go on dcterms.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants