You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello! I believe we've found a bug in the encoding of UTF-8 JSON when the COMBINE_SURROGATES_AS_UTF8 feature is enabled whereby some characters in the BMP, not belonging to the surrogate blocks, are incorrectly marked as such and therefore combined. This leads to invalid encoding results around those characters.
This happens with some characters that are specifically in the BMP but beyond the surrogate blocks. Notably this includes half- and full-width characters. Characters in the surrogate blocks of D800 - DFFF are correctly treated as surrogates and properly combined when the feature is enabled, and characters before those blocks are also encoded correctly as usual.
Here is a reproducible example:
JsonFactoryfactory = newJsonFactory();
ByteArrayOutputStreamout = newByteArrayOutputStream();
JsonGeneratorgen = factory.createGenerator(out);
gen.writeStartObject();
gen.enable(JsonGenerator.Feature.COMBINE_UNICODE_SURROGATES_IN_UTF8);
// Inside the BMP, beyond surrogate block; 0xFF0C - full-width comma gen.writeStringField("test_full_width", "foo" + newString(Character.toChars(0xFF0C)) + "bar");
// Inside the BMP, beyond surrogate block; 0xFE6A - small form percentgen.writeStringField("test_small_form", "foo" + newString(Character.toChars(0xFE6A)) + "bar");
// Inside the BMP, before the surrogate block; 0x3042 - Hiragana Agen.writeStringField("test_hiragana", "foo" + newString(Character.toChars(0x3042)) + "bar");
// Outside the BMP; 0x1F60A - emojigen.writeStringField("test_emoji", newString(Character.toChars(0x1F60A)));
gen.writeEndObject();
gen.close();
System.out.write(out.toByteArray());
This prints the following (image to show the broken encoding):
Notice that in the first two cases, the characters are treated as surrogates and attempted to be combined with the "b" in "bar" as it is the character immediately to the right, which results in the broken encoding we observe here. The case of a character before the surrogate block is properly encoded, and the emoji is properly combined, as expected.
Disabling the feature, of course, gives us the correct results with the emoji encoded to the escaped surrogate pair:
Since the surrogate blocks are in the range D800 - DFFF, they all have their first 5 bits as 11011. In the mask above, however, the 3rd bit can yield an incorrect truth statement on the conditional check. For example, consider U+FF08, the full-width open parentheses character. This would be 1111 1111 0000 1000, and when the mask is applied, we get 1101 1000 0000 0000 or D800. However, this character does not belong to any of the surrogate blocks and its first five bits are 11111. The issue is that the 3rd bit is 0 on the mask, which results in D800 after the mask is applied, even though FF08 is not a surrogate.
A quick fix might be to use 0xF800 as the mask so that the 3rd bit may be accounted for properly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
cowtowncoder
changed the title
Non-surrogate characters being incorrectly combined when feature is enabled
Non-surrogate characters being incorrectly combined when JsonWriteFeature.COMBINE_UNICODE_SURROGATES_IN_UTF8 is enabled
Nov 15, 2024
Version: 2.18.0+
Hello! I believe we've found a bug in the encoding of UTF-8 JSON when the
COMBINE_SURROGATES_AS_UTF8
feature is enabled whereby some characters in the BMP, not belonging to the surrogate blocks, are incorrectly marked as such and therefore combined. This leads to invalid encoding results around those characters.This happens with some characters that are specifically in the BMP but beyond the surrogate blocks. Notably this includes half- and full-width characters. Characters in the surrogate blocks of D800 - DFFF are correctly treated as surrogates and properly combined when the feature is enabled, and characters before those blocks are also encoded correctly as usual.
Here is a reproducible example:
This prints the following (image to show the broken encoding):
Notice that in the first two cases, the characters are treated as surrogates and attempted to be combined with the "b" in "bar" as it is the character immediately to the right, which results in the broken encoding we observe here. The case of a character before the surrogate block is properly encoded, and the emoji is properly combined, as expected.
Disabling the feature, of course, gives us the correct results with the emoji encoded to the escaped surrogate pair:
This appears to be caused by an incorrect mask used to check if a character is a surrogate:
jackson-core/src/main/java/com/fasterxml/jackson/core/json/UTF8JsonGenerator.java
Lines 2251 to 2254 in 93335d4
Since the surrogate blocks are in the range D800 - DFFF, they all have their first 5 bits as
11011
. In the mask above, however, the 3rd bit can yield an incorrect truth statement on the conditional check. For example, consider U+FF08, the full-width open parentheses character. This would be1111 1111 0000 1000
, and when the mask is applied, we get1101 1000 0000 0000
or D800. However, this character does not belong to any of the surrogate blocks and its first five bits are11111
. The issue is that the 3rd bit is 0 on the mask, which results in D800 after the mask is applied, even though FF08 is not a surrogate.A quick fix might be to use 0xF800 as the mask so that the 3rd bit may be accounted for properly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: