Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Naming convenction of random variables in spectral representation #209

Open
mbvoyager opened this issue Sep 25, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Naming convenction of random variables in spectral representation #209

mbvoyager opened this issue Sep 25, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@mbvoyager
Copy link
Collaborator

Samples of stochastic processes generated using spectral representation are now all labeled by the symbol :gm.

This results in the naming of the collection of generated signals (stochastic processes) as gm and the random phase angles as gm_1, gm_2, gm_3, ....
This is confusing. Since at least for spectral representation only the phase angles ϕ are the random variables, I think it would be better to name and number them as ϕ_1, ϕ_2, ϕ_3, ...

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants