-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add user module #2
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces environment variable placeholders, new dependencies, and several new SQL migration scripts. The migrations create and modify tables for a polling application, while the Prisma schema is updated with corresponding models. Additionally, a migration lock file is added. New files under the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant UsersController
participant UsersService
participant PrismaService
participant Database
Client->>UsersController: POST /users with CreateUserDto
UsersController->>UsersService: createUser(data)
UsersService->>PrismaService: user.create(data)
PrismaService->>Database: $connect() / SQL INSERT
Database-->>PrismaService: Confirmation
PrismaService-->>UsersService: User record created
UsersService-->>UsersController: Return user details
UsersController-->>Client: Send Response
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Nitpick comments (8)
src/users/users.module.ts (1)
2-2
: Consider using path aliases for imports.Instead of using relative paths, consider configuring and using path aliases in tsconfig.json for better maintainability.
Apply this diff:
-import { PrismaService } from 'src/prisma.service'; +import { PrismaService } from '@app/prisma.service';Add this to tsconfig.json:
{ "compilerOptions": { "paths": { "@app/*": ["src/*"] } } }src/users/users.controller.ts (1)
13-13
: Fix naming convention in constructor injection.Follow NestJS conventions by using the same name for the parameter as the service type.
Apply this diff:
- constructor(private userService: UsersService) {} + constructor(private usersService: UsersService) {}prisma/migrations/20250205172850_/migration.sql (1)
1-17
: Consider naming conventions and indexing strategy.
- The migration filename lacks a descriptive name, making it harder to track changes.
- The table name uses PascalCase, which might cause issues with some tools. Consider using snake_case.
- Consider adding an index on the
createdAt
column if you plan to query by date ranges.Apply this diff to fix the table name:
-- CreateTable -CREATE TABLE "User" ( +CREATE TABLE "users" ( "id" SERIAL NOT NULL, "worldId" TEXT NOT NULL, "username" TEXT NOT NULL, "name" TEXT NOT NULL, "createdAt" TIMESTAMP(3) NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP, - CONSTRAINT "User_pkey" PRIMARY KEY ("id") + CONSTRAINT "users_pkey" PRIMARY KEY ("id") ); -- CreateIndex -CREATE UNIQUE INDEX "User_worldId_key" ON "User"("worldId"); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX "users_worldId_key" ON "users"("worldId"); -- CreateIndex -CREATE UNIQUE INDEX "User_username_key" ON "User"("username"); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX "users_username_key" ON "users"("username"); +-- CreateIndex +CREATE INDEX "users_createdAt_idx" ON "users"("createdAt");Also, rename the migration file to something more descriptive, like
20250205172850_create_users_table.sql
.prisma/schema.prisma (3)
16-25
: Add indexes and onDelete behavior to User model.Consider the following improvements:
- Add an index on
createdAt
for efficient sorting/filtering- Define onDelete behavior for the Poll relation
model User{ id Int @id @default(autoincrement()) worldId String @unique() username String @unique() profilePicture String? pollsCreatedCount Int @default(0) - createdAt DateTime @default(now()) + createdAt DateTime @default(now()) @map("created_at") @@index([createdAt(sort: Desc)]) - poll Poll[] + poll Poll[] @relation("UserPolls", onDelete: Cascade) }
43-50
: Add index and onDelete behavior to Option model.Consider the following improvements:
- Add index on pollId for faster lookups
- Define onDelete behavior for relations
model Option { id Int @id @default(autoincrement()) optionText String - poll Poll @relation(fields: [pollId], references: [id]) + poll Poll @relation("PollOptions", fields: [pollId], references: [id]) pollId Int - votes Vote[] + votes Vote[] @relation("OptionVotes", onDelete: Cascade) createdAt DateTime @default(now()) + @@index([pollId]) }
52-57
: Add unique constraint to Tag model.Consider adding a unique constraint on the content field to prevent duplicate tags.
model Tag{ id Int @id @default(autoincrement()) - content String? + content String? @unique - poll Poll[] + poll Poll[] @relation("PollTags") }prisma/migrations/20250205193050_initail_entities/migration.sql (2)
16-23
: Add index to Option table.Add an index on pollId for better query performance when fetching options for a poll.
CREATE TABLE "Option" ( "id" SERIAL NOT NULL, "optionText" TEXT NOT NULL, "pollId" INTEGER NOT NULL, "createdAt" TIMESTAMP(3) NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP, CONSTRAINT "Option_pkey" PRIMARY KEY ("id") ); +CREATE INDEX "Option_pollId_idx" ON "Option"("pollId");
1-1
: Fix typo in migration filename.The migration filename contains a typo: "initail" should be "initial".
Rename the file from
20250205193050_initail_entities
to20250205193050_initial_entities
.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lock
is excluded by!**/yarn.lock
,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
.env.example
(1 hunks)package.json
(1 hunks)prisma/migrations/20250205172850_/migration.sql
(1 hunks)prisma/migrations/20250205180025_user_entity/migration.sql
(1 hunks)prisma/migrations/20250205193050_initail_entities/migration.sql
(1 hunks)prisma/migrations/migration_lock.toml
(1 hunks)prisma/schema.prisma
(1 hunks)src/app.module.ts
(1 hunks)src/prisma.service.ts
(1 hunks)src/users/dtos/CreateUser.dto.ts
(1 hunks)src/users/users.controller.ts
(1 hunks)src/users/users.module.ts
(1 hunks)src/users/users.service.ts
(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- prisma/migrations/migration_lock.toml
- .env.example
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 ESLint
src/app.module.ts
[error] 4-4: 'UsersService' is defined but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/users/dtos/CreateUser.dto.ts (1)
1-15
: LGTM! Well-structured DTO with appropriate validation rules.The DTO is well-designed with proper validation decorators and consistent naming conventions.
prisma/migrations/20250205180025_user_entity/migration.sql (1)
1-10
: Consider data migration strategy before dropping the name column.The migration drops the required
name
column without preserving or migrating the existing data. This could lead to data loss in production.Consider these options:
- If the column is no longer needed, ensure there's no valuable data before applying the migration.
- If the data needs to be preserved, create a separate migration to:
- Copy data to a new column if needed
- Make the column optional first
- Then drop it in a subsequent migration
Run this script to check if there's existing data:
❌ Verification inconclusive
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if there's data in the name column before dropping it # Connect to the database and count records with non-null names psql "$DATABASE_URL" -c "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM \"User\" WHERE name IS NOT NULL;"Length of output: 161
Action Required: Manually Verify Data Preservation for the
name
ColumnThe executed script did not produce output because the environment lacks the
psql
command, so we couldn’t automatically verify if there’s data in thename
column before it’s dropped. Please run the query on an environment wherepsql
is available (for example, your production or staging database) to confirm whether any non-null data exists. If data is present, consider employing a migration strategy that preserves it (e.g., copying to a new column before dropping) to prevent potential data loss.package.json (1)
26-26
:⚠️ Potential issueVerify @prisma/client version.
The specified version
^6.3.1
seems incorrect as Prisma's current major version is 5.x.Update to the correct version:
- "@prisma/client": "^6.3.1", + "@prisma/client": "^5.9.1",❌ Incorrect review comment
🌐 Web query:
What is the latest version of @prisma/client?
💡 Result:
The latest stable version of
@prisma/client
as of February 2025 is 6.3.1, released as part of Prisma ORM v6[1][8]. This release introduced several improvements:Key updates in v6.x
- Prisma Studio enhancements:
- Unified model navigation with persistent UI state[1]
- Bulk row editing via sidebar[1]
- Breaking changes:
- Minimum supported Node.js versions: v18 (18.18+), v20 (20.9+), v22 (22.11+)[10]
- TypeScript requirement increased to v5.1+[10]
- New features:
updateManyAndReturn
method[2]- ULID support[2]
For production upgrades:
npm install @prisma/client@latest npm install -D prisma@latest npx prisma generateAlways check the Prisma Upgrade Guide before major version migrations[2][7].
Citations:
- 1: https://github.com/prisma/prisma/releases
- 2: https://www.prisma.io/docs/orm/more/upgrade-guides/upgrading-versions/upgrading-to-prisma-5
- 3: https://github.com/RobertCraigie/prisma-client-py/releases
- 4: https://www.prisma.io/docs/getting-started/setup-prisma/start-from-scratch/relational-databases/install-prisma-client-typescript-postgresql
- 5: https://www.prisma.io/docs/orm/more/releases
- 6: https://pypi.org/project/prisma/
- 7: https://www.prisma.io/docs/orm/more/upgrade-guides/upgrading-versions
- 8: https://www.prisma.io/changelog
- 9: https://prisma-client-py.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
- 10: https://www.gitclear.com/open_repos/prisma/prisma/release/6.0.0
@prisma/client version is correct.
The web query confirms that the latest stable version as of February 2025 is indeed 6.3.1. No changes to the dependency are needed.
Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
async onModuleInit() { | ||
await this.$connect() | ||
.then(() => console.log('Connected to DB')) | ||
.catch((err) => console.log(err)); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error handling and logging.
- Use NestJS Logger instead of console.log for consistent logging across the application.
- Consider throwing the error to prevent the application from starting with a failed DB connection.
Apply this diff:
- async onModuleInit() {
- await this.$connect()
- .then(() => console.log('Connected to DB'))
- .catch((err) => console.log(err));
+ private readonly logger = new Logger(PrismaService.name);
+
+ async onModuleInit() {
+ try {
+ await this.$connect();
+ this.logger.log('Successfully connected to database');
+ } catch (error) {
+ this.logger.error('Failed to connect to database', error);
+ throw error;
+ }
}
Don't forget to import Logger:
import { Injectable, Logger, OnModuleInit } from '@nestjs/common';
async createUser(data: Prisma.UserCreateInput) { | ||
console.log(data); | ||
return this.prisma.user.create({ data }); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error handling, logging, and type safety.
- Replace console.log with NestJS Logger
- Add error handling for database operations
- Add return type annotation
Apply this diff:
+ private readonly logger = new Logger(UsersService.name);
+
- async createUser(data: Prisma.UserCreateInput) {
- console.log(data);
- return this.prisma.user.create({ data });
+ async createUser(data: Prisma.UserCreateInput): Promise<Prisma.User> {
+ this.logger.debug('Creating user', data);
+ try {
+ return await this.prisma.user.create({ data });
+ } catch (error) {
+ this.logger.error('Failed to create user', error);
+ throw new InternalServerErrorException('Failed to create user');
+ }
}
Don't forget to import:
import { Injectable, InternalServerErrorException, Logger } from '@nestjs/common';
import { UsersService } from './users/users.service'; | ||
import { UsersController } from './users/users.controller'; | ||
import { UsersModule } from './users/users.module'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove unused imports and fix module configuration.
- The
UsersService
import is unused and can be removed. - The
UsersController
is already provided throughUsersModule
, so it should be removed from thecontrollers
array to avoid duplicate registration.
Apply this diff to fix the issues:
-import { UsersService } from './users/users.service';
-import { UsersController } from './users/users.controller';
import { UsersModule } from './users/users.module';
@Module({
imports: [UsersModule],
- controllers: [AppController, UsersController],
+ controllers: [AppController],
providers: [AppService],
})
Also applies to: 9-10
🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint
[error] 4-4: 'UsersService' is defined but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
@Post() | ||
@UsePipes(ValidationPipe) | ||
async createUser(@Body() createUserDto: CreateUserDto) { | ||
return await this.userService.createUser(createUserDto); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance method implementation with response type and error handling.
- Update the service name to match the constructor.
- Add response type for better type safety.
- Add error handling for potential database conflicts.
Apply this diff:
@Post()
@UsePipes(ValidationPipe)
- async createUser(@Body() createUserDto: CreateUserDto) {
- return await this.userService.createUser(createUserDto);
+ async createUser(@Body() createUserDto: CreateUserDto): Promise<User> {
+ try {
+ return await this.usersService.createUser(createUserDto);
+ } catch (error) {
+ if (error.code === 'P2002') {
+ throw new ConflictException('User with this worldId or username already exists');
+ }
+ throw error;
+ }
}
Don't forget to add these imports:
import { ConflictException } from '@nestjs/common';
import { User } from '@prisma/client';
model Poll{ | ||
id Int @id @default(autoincrement()) | ||
user User @relation(fields: [userId],references: [id]) | ||
userId Int | ||
title String | ||
description String? | ||
options Option[] | ||
tags Tag[] | ||
createdAt DateTime @default(now()) | ||
startDate DateTime @default(now()) | ||
endDate DateTime | ||
isAnonymous Boolean @default(false) | ||
|
||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add validation and indexes to Poll model.
Consider the following improvements:
- Add validation to ensure startDate is before endDate
- Add index on userId for faster lookups
- Define onDelete behavior for relations
model Poll{
id Int @id @default(autoincrement())
- user User @relation(fields: [userId],references: [id])
+ user User @relation("UserPolls", fields: [userId],references: [id])
userId Int
title String
description String?
- options Option[]
+ options Option[] @relation("PollOptions", onDelete: Cascade)
- tags Tag[]
+ tags Tag[] @relation("PollTags")
createdAt DateTime @default(now())
startDate DateTime @default(now())
endDate DateTime
isAnonymous Boolean @default(false)
+ @@index([userId])
+ @@check(startDate <= endDate)
}
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
model Poll{ | |
id Int @id @default(autoincrement()) | |
user User @relation(fields: [userId],references: [id]) | |
userId Int | |
title String | |
description String? | |
options Option[] | |
tags Tag[] | |
createdAt DateTime @default(now()) | |
startDate DateTime @default(now()) | |
endDate DateTime | |
isAnonymous Boolean @default(false) | |
} | |
model Poll{ | |
id Int @id @default(autoincrement()) | |
user User @relation("UserPolls", fields: [userId], references: [id]) | |
userId Int | |
title String | |
description String? | |
options Option[] @relation("PollOptions", onDelete: Cascade) | |
tags Tag[] @relation("PollTags") | |
createdAt DateTime @default(now()) | |
startDate DateTime @default(now()) | |
endDate DateTime | |
isAnonymous Boolean @default(false) | |
@@index([userId]) | |
@@check(startDate <= endDate) | |
} |
model Vote{ | ||
id Int @id @default(autoincrement()) | ||
weight Int | ||
option Option @relation(fields: [optionId], references: [id]) | ||
optionId Int | ||
createdAt DateTime @default(now()) | ||
proof String[] | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add validation and index to Vote model.
Consider the following improvements:
- Add validation for weight field
- Add index on optionId for faster lookups
- Consider using JSONB for proof array if using PostgreSQL
model Vote{
id Int @id @default(autoincrement())
- weight Int
+ weight Int @check(weight > 0)
- option Option @relation(fields: [optionId], references: [id])
+ option Option @relation("OptionVotes", fields: [optionId], references: [id])
optionId Int
createdAt DateTime @default(now())
- proof String[]
+ proof String[] @db.JsonB
+ @@index([optionId])
}
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
model Vote{ | |
id Int @id @default(autoincrement()) | |
weight Int | |
option Option @relation(fields: [optionId], references: [id]) | |
optionId Int | |
createdAt DateTime @default(now()) | |
proof String[] | |
} | |
model Vote{ | |
id Int @id @default(autoincrement()) | |
weight Int @check(weight > 0) | |
option Option @relation("OptionVotes", fields: [optionId], references: [id]) | |
optionId Int | |
createdAt DateTime @default(now()) | |
proof String[] @db.JsonB | |
@@index([optionId]) | |
} |
CREATE TABLE "Vote" ( | ||
"id" SERIAL NOT NULL, | ||
"weight" INTEGER NOT NULL, | ||
"optionId" INTEGER NOT NULL, | ||
"createdAt" TIMESTAMP(3) NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP, | ||
"proof" TEXT[], | ||
|
||
CONSTRAINT "Vote_pkey" PRIMARY KEY ("id") | ||
); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add constraints and index to Vote table.
Consider adding:
- Check constraint for positive weight values
- Index on optionId for better query performance
- Use JSONB type for proof array
CREATE TABLE "Vote" (
"id" SERIAL NOT NULL,
"weight" INTEGER NOT NULL,
"optionId" INTEGER NOT NULL,
"createdAt" TIMESTAMP(3) NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
- "proof" TEXT[],
+ "proof" JSONB,
- CONSTRAINT "Vote_pkey" PRIMARY KEY ("id")
+ CONSTRAINT "Vote_pkey" PRIMARY KEY ("id"),
+ CONSTRAINT "Vote_weight_check" CHECK ("weight" > 0)
);
+CREATE INDEX "Vote_optionId_idx" ON "Vote"("optionId");
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
CREATE TABLE "Vote" ( | |
"id" SERIAL NOT NULL, | |
"weight" INTEGER NOT NULL, | |
"optionId" INTEGER NOT NULL, | |
"createdAt" TIMESTAMP(3) NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP, | |
"proof" TEXT[], | |
CONSTRAINT "Vote_pkey" PRIMARY KEY ("id") | |
); | |
CREATE TABLE "Vote" ( | |
"id" SERIAL NOT NULL, | |
"weight" INTEGER NOT NULL, | |
"optionId" INTEGER NOT NULL, | |
"createdAt" TIMESTAMP(3) NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP, | |
"proof" JSONB, | |
CONSTRAINT "Vote_pkey" PRIMARY KEY ("id"), | |
CONSTRAINT "Vote_weight_check" CHECK ("weight" > 0) | |
); | |
CREATE INDEX "Vote_optionId_idx" ON "Vote"("optionId"); |
-- CreateTable | ||
CREATE TABLE "Poll" ( | ||
"id" SERIAL NOT NULL, | ||
"userId" INTEGER NOT NULL, | ||
"title" TEXT NOT NULL, | ||
"description" TEXT, | ||
"createdAt" TIMESTAMP(3) NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP, | ||
"startDate" TIMESTAMP(3) NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP, | ||
"endDate" TIMESTAMP(3) NOT NULL, | ||
"isAnonymous" BOOLEAN NOT NULL DEFAULT false, | ||
|
||
CONSTRAINT "Poll_pkey" PRIMARY KEY ("id") | ||
); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add missing indexes and constraints to Poll table.
Consider adding:
- Index on userId for better query performance
- Check constraint to ensure startDate is before endDate
CREATE TABLE "Poll" (
"id" SERIAL NOT NULL,
"userId" INTEGER NOT NULL,
"title" TEXT NOT NULL,
"description" TEXT,
"createdAt" TIMESTAMP(3) NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
"startDate" TIMESTAMP(3) NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
"endDate" TIMESTAMP(3) NOT NULL,
"isAnonymous" BOOLEAN NOT NULL DEFAULT false,
CONSTRAINT "Poll_pkey" PRIMARY KEY ("id")
+ CONSTRAINT "Poll_dates_check" CHECK ("startDate" <= "endDate")
);
+CREATE INDEX "Poll_userId_idx" ON "Poll"("userId");
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
Summary by CodeRabbit