Open GUI for GNU Gama

[zvezdochiot]

Under Windows, there is a good GUI for the GNU Gama: https://geodesist.ru/posts/833297 (https://yadi.sk/d/wZ4_p6WgMUiMkQ). But it is without open source.

GeoEasy is partly a GUI to the GNU Gama. But only partially.

❓ Maybe you should try to make a full-fledged open GUI to GNU Gama?

[zvezdochiot]

Hi @cepek .

I sent you a letter to [email protected] with the text:

Hi, Ales Cepek.

http://freereason.dyndns.org/files/fa_src.zip not available.

Could you send the source code to this address?

But I’m not sure that it has reached you. Waiting for an answer.

[cepek]

Hi @звездочёт
I do not visit github regularly so I am answering only now. Do you know that there are Windows build available for gama-q2 at https://sourceforge.net/projects/gnu-gama-q2/
Aleš

[zsiki]

What do you miss in GeoEasy to be full-flagged?

[zvezdochiot]

Hi, @cepek .

I saw the gama-q2 project, but I could not run it either under WINE or under WIN10. Unlike FreeAdjust.

Hi @zsiki .

In order to understand the differences in use, you need to familiarize yourself with how FreeAdjust works (from the link in the first post).

PS: I apologize for the long silence. My git web interface was blocked.

[zvezdochiot]

Hi @cepek .

See https://geodesist.ru/threads/gnu-gama.86414/

[zvezdochiot]

Hi @zsiki .

See https://geodesist.ru/threads/geoeasy-3-0-3.70513/

[zvezdochiot]

Resolved: https://github.com/Geo-Linux-Calculations/GeoEasy/releases/tag/3.1.4-gama

[cepek]

Congratulations! I am impressed. By the way, we are (me and Petra) working on a new version of Qt based GUI for gama, I am considering internationalization and I would love to start with Russian. But before we must finish the next release. Let me know if you are possibly interested Aleš

…

On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 at 21:01, звездочёт ***@***.***> wrote: Resolved: https://github.com/Geo-Linux-Calculations/GeoEasy/releases/tag/3.1.4-gama — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/orgs/Geo-Linux-Calculations/teams/gama-gui/discussions/1/comments/7>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABVNT3Y5CFFGCAYHSYHHGQ3S7QOBNANCNFSM4ODJK6EQ> .

[zvezdochiot]

Hi @cepek .

The https://github.com/cepek/qgama21 I've seen. The resulting solution for gama-local suits me completely. Now I'm more concerned with another component of GNU Gama: gama-g3. Unfinished and abandoned.

In https://github.com/Geo-Linux-Calculations/gnu-gama-g3 I have posted a few edits with an example from https://geodesist.ru/threads/gnu-gama.86414/page-4#post-993952 . The same example used at https://github.com/Geo-Linux-Calculations/adjust . These edits did not complete this component, but at least made it workable.

[zvezdochiot]

Hi @cepek .

Interested in the possibility of bringing the zenith angles to the middle of the line along the average radius of the Earth:

#define defREarth 6370009.0
double atmospheric = 0.0, RE = defREarth;
z -= (RE > 0.0) ? (L * sin(z) * 0.5 / RE * (1.0 - atmospheric)) : 0.0;

Is there such or similar mechanism in gama-local?

dZ = (- 1004,988*sin(pi/180*(84+17/60+38/3600))/2/6370009*(1-0))*180/pi*60*60
= -16,2"

Z(R) = 84d 17' 38" - 16" =  84d 17' 22"

H = 100+1004,988*cos(pi/180*(84+17/60+38/3600))
= 199,9218 [-o,o782]

H(R) = 100+1004,988*cos(pi/180*(84+17/60+22/3600))
= 199,9994 [-o,ooo6]

D = 1004,988*sin(pi/180*(84+17/60+38/3600))
= 1000,0083 [+o,oo83]

D(R) = 1004,988*sin(pi/180*(84+17/60+22/3600))
= 1000,0005 [+o,ooo5]

[zvezdochiot]

Hi @cepek .

Mode "Find error" for gama-local?

Some programs have the ability to completely enumerate options for disabling one measurement and outputting an estimate of the unit of weight without this measurement. Gama-local has a partial output of this. But I would like to have a complete conclusion.

[cepek]

I am not sure if I understand what you mean by "a complete conclusion", see https://www.gnu.org/software/gama/manual/gama.html section 5.4 (Test on the reference standard deviation) equation 6. Gama-local is a command line tool, if you want to experiment with the adjustment interactively (removing one or more observations etc.), there is qgama project. a.

…

On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 at 14:59, звездочёт ***@***.***> wrote: Hi @cepek <https://github.com/cepek> . Mode "Find error" for gama-local? Some programs have the ability to completely enumerate options for disabling one measurement and outputting an estimate of the unit of weight without this measurement. Gama-local has a partial output of this. But I would like to have a complete conclusion. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/orgs/Geo-Linux-Calculations/teams/gama-gui/discussions/1/comments/11>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABVNT357DJW3GLF6CLCMXP3VNH6PXANCNFSM4ODJK6EQ> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[zvezdochiot]

Hi @cepek .

Here is an example of the output of "Error Search" in RGS:

Station: ST1
D1, ^(35,45,7)                                                  -    0  - 68561.663442
M1, ^(213,53,14)                                                -    0  - 69960.615861
M2, ^(228,8,47)                                                 -    0  - 69951.615104
G3, ^(234,7,20)                                                 -    0  - 69983.259470
G4, ^(238,28,0)                                                 -    0  - 69862.676618
M3, ^(238,30,6)                                                 -    0  - 66622.842142
G5, ^(245,11,13)                                                -    0  - 69857.688089
M4, ^(249,39,49)                                                -    0  - 69841.228884
G8, ^(261,22,9)                                                 -    0  - 66940.051912
M6, ^(271,5,36)                                                 -    0  - 70263.672332
G10, ^(271,8,1)                                                 -    0  - 59730.096184
M5, ^(274,59,4)                                                 -    0  - 125.902365
Station: ST2
M2, ^(3,44,37)                                                  -    0  - 69949.870564
G3, ^(7,8,6)                                                    -    0  - 69919.699452
M3, ^(9,25,39)                                                  -    0  - 69884.977619
M4, ^(16,16,24)                                                 -    0  - 75933.042523
M5, ^(25,56,26)                                                 -    0  - 63529.109368
M6, ^(37,0,55)                                                  -    0  - 69530.278125
G10, ^(37,5,3)                                                  -    0  - 66122.033781
M7, ^(47,18,34)                                                 -    0  - 63426.633435
M8, ^(55,41,20)                                                 -    0  - 63539.456230
M9, ^(61,40,32)                                                 -    0  - 69955.019936
M10, ^(70,29,1)                                                 -    0  - 66683.167848
G19, ^(70,32,26)                                                -    0  - 66685.403928
MM9, ^(184,23,53)                                               -    0  - 69955.103252
D1, ^(254,54,39)                                                -    0  - 69928.631603
M1, ^(358,38,41)                                                -    0  - 69930.439300
...

Direction ST1-M5 is the first error.