You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
From Luc:
no need to add afcon. it’s a very small data set and misses some countries, so it looks weird.
it was used as the example in the LISA paper, but the sample size is too small for “modern” use.
a few of them are “classic” (but then also old), such as
Auckland (used in an early paper to illustrate EB smoothing)
Elect80 (US counties election results), used as example for spatial probit, but
from the looks of it, it doesn’t have the 0-1. we have a better one from LeSage
with the 1996 elections (I used in my Brown class — I can produce if we don’t
have it)
house: Lucas county housing data (points) - is originally from LeSage toolbox
NY_Data is Leukemia data from the Waller-Gotway book, as points
(it would be nice to supplement with the actual tract areas as polygons)
but typically these data sets have very few variables, so not that useful.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
low priority - for later: R sample data
http://origin.rdrr.io/rforge/splm/
splm/data/Insurance.rda
splm/data/RiceFarms.rda
splm/data/itaww.rda
splm/data/riceww.rda
splm/data/usaww.rda
http://origin.rdrr.io/rforge/spdep/
spdep/data/NY_data.rda
spdep/data/afcon.rda
spdep/data/auckland.rda
spdep/data/baltimore.rda
spdep/data/boston.rda
spdep/data/columbus.rda
spdep/data/datalist
spdep/data/eire.rda
spdep/data/elect80.rda
spdep/data/getisord.rda
spdep/data/hopkins.rda
spdep/data/house.RData
spdep/data/huddersfield.rda
spdep/data/nc.sids.rda
spdep/data/oldcol.rda
spdep/data/used.cars.rda
spdep/data/wheat.rda
From Luc:
no need to add afcon. it’s a very small data set and misses some countries, so it looks weird.
it was used as the example in the LISA paper, but the sample size is too small for “modern” use.
a few of them are “classic” (but then also old), such as
from the looks of it, it doesn’t have the 0-1. we have a better one from LeSage
with the 1996 elections (I used in my Brown class — I can produce if we don’t
have it)
(it would be nice to supplement with the actual tract areas as polygons)
but typically these data sets have very few variables, so not that useful.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: