Suggestion: Dynamic vs static indicator

[johnyqi]

I will throw this just as an idea, maybe one day can be considered.

There is always a question whether bot should wait for candle closure, or to react on the first signal.

So for example, if we use HMA+RSI, we could tell HMA to react on candle closure (static) but RSI to react on first signal (dynamic). This is good in case if HMA signal comes first, and then it has to wait for another candle to confirm possible RSI signal, which of course will result in lost time.

So, would be nice to have an option to set indicator as dynamic or static.

[Flllexa]

We are adding this feature exactly now... Sorry, we had a lot work to be here... but you can implement it using our code editor, the decision if buy or not you can set using your codes.

You can add exactly the current price to datasource, follow the command:

[MaJorDan383]

Not only is this a very good idea, it is necessary for the proper functioning of strategies.

It is basically how backtests calculate, especially highly sensitive (and thus more profitable using leverage) strategies.

First signal of candle and on close options. Why this would be low priority or on hold is beyond me.