Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

GDKPd Options Interface - Default Item Prices #27

Open
Gogo1951 opened this issue Nov 16, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

GDKPd Options Interface - Default Item Prices #27

Gogo1951 opened this issue Nov 16, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
Priority - 3 Average Type - New Functionality
Milestone
Rewrite

Comments

@Gogo1951
Copy link
Owner

Gogo1951 commented Nov 16, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Story

Need a way for users to pre-set min prices for their groups.

Acceptance Criteria

  • This needs to be dirt simple. Let's just import the data and let them edit it in-game.
  • We can include BoP items from various raids. We can get that data easy enough.

Wireframes / Design Links

Let's start with BOP items from specific raids to start. Should be easy to get that data.

Options - Default Item Prices@2x

Legacy Screenshots

This was AIDS before. Just the worst.
@Gogo1951 Gogo1951 moved this to Planning in GDKPd | Project Board Nov 16, 2022
@Gogo1951 Gogo1951 changed the title GDKPd Options Interface - GDKPd Options Interface - Default Item Prices Nov 16, 2022
@Gogo1951 Gogo1951 moved this from Planning to To Do in GDKPd | Project Board Nov 26, 2022
@TannerShmoog TannerShmoog moved this from To Do to In Progress in GDKPd | Project Board Nov 30, 2022
@TannerShmoog TannerShmoog moved this from In Progress to To Do in GDKPd | Project Board Dec 14, 2022
@KaylinFinke KaylinFinke added this to the Rewrite milestone Sep 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Priority - 3 Average Type - New Functionality
Projects
GDKPd | Project Board
Status: To Do
Milestone
Rewrite
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@KaylinFinke @TannerShmoog @Gogo1951