Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
Yes please! This has been on my bucket list for years and years. I wonder though how to make this appealing these days. I rarely copy photos off my phone. I wonder if there's a way to integrate with Apple/Google Photos to pull things in somewhat automatically?
I would personally prefer to have things organized directly in the filesystem like Picasa did. If I want to send someone a photo, I don't want to open the photo software and "export" it, I want to just browse to it. That said, I think the software can be quite opinionated about the folder structure it wants. Like, it can be pretty flat...no need for any crazy hierarchy, I just want photos grouped by date. I can imagine many extras beyond what you've listed here...I actually get a lot of value out of the map view in Apple Photos, for example. It's a lot easier to find a particular vacation photo by browsing a map than browsing by date. But I certainly wouldn't care about that right away. (Honestly I wouldn't mind if it was just an independent clone of Apple Photos...) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
FWIW, I'm working on and off on a GUI project for browsing my archive of photos and backing them up in a chosen number of duplicate locations (https://github.com/akavel/backerrs). [Unfortunately, more off than on recently, as I had some tense months, and not so sure I started recovering yet.] Miniatures of the photos are dumped in a SQLite database. I want to add tagging, but it's not done yet. The 2nd stage plan for this will be to allow pushing the images to IPFS and Hypercore, including e.g. some RPi-based NAS box in a closet. This would also include easy creation of "galleries" for Friends & Family to browse. I explored this idea in https://github.com/akavel/catation. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Since Google killed Picasa there's been no real good alternative to it.
You have the usual Adobe tools, but you gotta part with nearly 10 bucks a month just to get an image organizer.
You can't even buy a one-off license anymore.
Other "pro" tools are ridiculously expensive and tend to also use a subscription-style payment option.
There's nothing for an average person that just wants to organize their pictures and do some minor editing.
This tool should cover the basics like
Some extras that would be neat:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions