You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to know, what is the correct way to bind the queues with exchange so that communication occurs with any error/message duplication /message echos.
as the instructions from CFX page on RabbitMQ Installation, the exchange has to fan Out type. (correct me if I am wrong)
If I bind both my queues to exchange(FANOUT), the messages sent from one endpoint are sent to Exchange and from exchange to both the binded queues. In this case, the sender will listen his own sending message (MESSAGE-ECHO).
Can I change the exchange to Direct type exchange?. so that the routing can bring in to action? if yes, how is the routing configured in cfx endpoints settings?. is it same name as queue?
Is there any better way to handle this situation?
Thanks in Advance
Manikanth
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Perugu-MR
changed the title
Need help on exchange and queue Bindings
Exchange and queue Bindings on RabbitMQ
Oct 30, 2024
Perugu-MR
changed the title
Exchange and queue Bindings on RabbitMQ
Clarification on Exchange and queue Bindings on RabbitMQ
Oct 30, 2024
Hi All,
I would like to know, what is the correct way to bind the queues with exchange so that communication occurs with any error/message duplication /message echos.
as the instructions from CFX page on RabbitMQ Installation, the exchange has to fan Out type. (correct me if I am wrong)
If I bind both my queues to exchange(FANOUT), the messages sent from one endpoint are sent to Exchange and from exchange to both the binded queues. In this case, the sender will listen his own sending message (MESSAGE-ECHO).
Can I change the exchange to Direct type exchange?. so that the routing can bring in to action? if yes, how is the routing configured in cfx endpoints settings?. is it same name as queue?
Is there any better way to handle this situation?
Thanks in Advance
Manikanth
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: