You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I worked with the data yesterday and noticed that there are very few entries with the field Justification filled.
I saw that you are only computing this value for one specific type of amendment destination (ESPELHO DE EMENDAS AO TEXTO DA LEI) which is also very limited.
I opened one of the PDFs without justification and seems reasonable to have that field available.
There is any reason why you make this distinction in amendment_parser.py?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello @Irio thanks for the nice package.
I worked with the data yesterday and noticed that there are very few entries with the field Justification filled.
I saw that you are only computing this value for one specific type of amendment destination (ESPELHO DE EMENDAS AO TEXTO DA LEI) which is also very limited.
I opened one of the PDFs without justification and seems reasonable to have that field available.
There is any reason why you make this distinction in amendment_parser.py?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: