Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing justification field #1

Open
wandersoncferreira opened this issue Sep 26, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Missing justification field #1

wandersoncferreira opened this issue Sep 26, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@wandersoncferreira
Copy link

wandersoncferreira commented Sep 26, 2017

Hello @Irio thanks for the nice package.

I worked with the data yesterday and noticed that there are very few entries with the field Justification filled.

I saw that you are only computing this value for one specific type of amendment destination (ESPELHO DE EMENDAS AO TEXTO DA LEI) which is also very limited.

I opened one of the PDFs without justification and seems reasonable to have that field available.

There is any reason why you make this distinction in amendment_parser.py?

Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant