You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Based upon discussions in Issue #2095, the Data Table Generator will most likely move away from using the String type to another faster, more space-efficient type (likely the ByteString type).
However, a re-investigation (as per @JacquesCarette's request) should likely take place to determine the best "state of the practice" before committing to a change. Maybe look among alternatives to find the best choice type.
Note: the current version of the Data Table Generator (in /scripts/) is currently contained in this branch, and is awaiting merge approval in this pull request.
Note: pull request has been merged.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Based upon discussions in Issue #2095, the Data Table Generator will most likely move away from using the
String
type to another faster, more space-efficient type (likely theByteString
type).However, a re-investigation (as per @JacquesCarette's request) should likely take place to determine the best "state of the practice" before committing to a change. Maybe look among alternatives to find the best choice type.
Note: the current version of the Data Table Generator (in /scripts/) is currently contained in this branch, and is awaiting merge approval in this pull request.Note: pull request has been merged.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: