You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We should note it as an open question, whether std::process should be thread safe.
The question started with the a discussion of if multiple threads could call 'wait' and the fact that it might update the object means synchronization. Also suggested that wait could be implemented as wait_for(0) to improve this (Chris K suggested).
After more discussion of posix and other apis seemed that the general conclusion is that it doesn't need to be thread safe.
Not adding to anything to the paper just yet.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We should note it as an open question, whether std::process should be thread safe.
The question started with the a discussion of if multiple threads could call 'wait' and the fact that it might update the object means synchronization. Also suggested that wait could be implemented as wait_for(0) to improve this (Chris K suggested).
After more discussion of posix and other apis seemed that the general conclusion is that it doesn't need to be thread safe.
Not adding to anything to the paper just yet.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: