[PackageEvaluator.jl] Your package MessageUtils may have a testing issue.

[IainNZ]

This issue is being filed by a script, but if you reply, I will see it.

PackageEvaluator.jl is a script that runs nightly. It attempts to load all Julia packages and run their test (if available) on both the stable version of Julia (0.2) and the nightly build of the unstable version (0.3).

The results of this script are used to generate a package listing enhanced with testing results.

The status of this package, MessageUtils, on...

• Julia 0.2 is 'Package doesn't load.'
• Julia 0.3 is 'Package doesn't load.'

'No tests, but package loads.' can be due to their being no tests (you should write some if you can!) but can also be due to PackageEvaluator not being able to find your tests. Consider adding a test/runtests.jl file.

'Package doesn't load.' is the worst-case scenario. Sometimes this arises because your package doesn't have BinDeps support, or needs something that can't be installed with BinDeps. If this is the case for your package, please file an issue and an exception can be made so your package will not be tested.

This automatically filed issue is a one-off message. Starting soon, issues will only be filed when the testing status of your package changes in a negative direction (gets worse). If you'd like to opt-out of these status-change messages, reply to this message.

[IainNZ]

INFO: Installing MessageUtils v0.0.1
INFO: Package database updated
ERROR: MessageUtils not found
 in require at loading.jl:47
 in include at boot.jl:244
 in include_from_node1 at loading.jl:128
while loading /home/idunning/pkgtest/.julia/v0.3/MessageUtils/testusing.jl, in expression starting on line 1
INFO: Package database updated

[amitmurthy]

It loaded fine on OSX and Linux for me here. The REQUIRES file states a dependency on 0.3, so I guess it shouldn't run the tests on 0.2.

Also, I assume /testusing.jl is a script that the PackageEvaluator adds?

Anything else I should look for?

[IainNZ]

Yep it can't find a test script, so tries to load it (creates that script to do so). Are you sure METADATA had that requirement and was on a recent sha? PackageEval uses Pkg so it won't install something if Pkg won't allow it. I'm away from a computer for a few days so test results online are stale if you've bumped it.