Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cloud Authentication is declared as needed but it is not (or at least not always). #485

Closed
distante opened this issue Dec 18, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
Invalid Bug/Enhancement not related to integration or already available.

Comments

@distante
Copy link

Description

As per #469 (comment)

New firmware requires TPLink account password in order to control camera locally. You already have one which you used for official app.

I have several Tapo C200 cameras with firmware 1.3.9 (Build 231019 Rel.37378n(4555) and C210 with firmware 1.39 (Build 231019 Rel.31045n(4555) and I can control them using the TinyCam app on Android without the need to put any cloud password.

Why would it be different for HA control?

Reproduction Steps

  1. Try to add a camera
  2. Put local password

Expected behavior

Cloud auth should be optional if needed for some special cameras.

If applicable, add error logs.

No response

Device Firmware

1.3.9 (Build 231019 Rel.37378n(4555)

Integration Version

5.4.12

Using stream component

Yes

Does camera work via official integrations?

Yes

Camera has all attributes filled out in developer tools

Yes

HASS Environment

VM in Proxmox

Search for similar issues

Yes

Additional information

No response

@JurajNyiri
Copy link
Owner

JurajNyiri commented Dec 18, 2023

It is needed.

Tinycam uses onvif for control where as this integration uses proprietary tplink protocol.

@distante
Copy link
Author

It is needed.

My I ask, why exactly?

@JurajNyiri
Copy link
Owner

See edit.

@JurajNyiri JurajNyiri added the Invalid Bug/Enhancement not related to integration or already available. label Dec 18, 2023
@distante
Copy link
Author

Understood

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Invalid Bug/Enhancement not related to integration or already available.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants