We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
有一个问题——每次顺序都是b站、微博、知乎。 也就是说b站的首轮输出从来没受其它两者输出的影响,而微博的的输出永远接在了b站的后面,最后知乎输入了两者的发言来总结陈词。 这似乎导致了第一轮永远是b站立论,微博驳论,知乎综述的现象。 这样的话b站和微博的对抗可能会相对更明显,而知乎会变的更中立客观? 可能需要随机发言(或起码随机首轮的发言顺序)来排除发言顺序对发言风格的影响。
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
有一个问题——每次顺序都是b站、微博、知乎。
也就是说b站的首轮输出从来没受其它两者输出的影响,而微博的的输出永远接在了b站的后面,最后知乎输入了两者的发言来总结陈词。
这似乎导致了第一轮永远是b站立论,微博驳论,知乎综述的现象。
这样的话b站和微博的对抗可能会相对更明显,而知乎会变的更中立客观?
可能需要随机发言(或起码随机首轮的发言顺序)来排除发言顺序对发言风格的影响。
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: