You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to contribute a python evaluation pipeline that can take in maps as NumPy array and convert it to voxelized pointcloud in pcd file, which can be further sent into your "analysis_py3.py" script. So as a sanity check, I build up a gt map based on frames 00 (4390 - 4530) and run the script, but the result is awful. I checked your "mapgen.hpp" and this is how I built the map:
I retrive scans 00 (4390 - 4530), transform them to the world frame using their pose, and additionally lift their height by 1.73.
I notice you use the "intensity" field to store labels. So, I append their 32 bit panoptic labels, which combine the semantic and instance labels, as a 4-th column to the original xyz.
I voxelize and preserve the labels as the voxelize_preserving_labels function in "erasor_utils.cpp", where I replace the intensity of voxelized points with the intensity of their nearest neighbor after voxelization with size 0.2.
I save it as a pcd file.
Since I do not filter out any points, I expect to have a result like ~100% preservation (all static point remains) and ~0 rejection (no dynamic point removed at all). However, I got a result like:
| # stat. pts | # dyn. pts | % | # est. stat. pts | # est. dyn. pts | % | Preservation | rejection | F1 |
|---------------+--------------+---------+--------------------+-------------------+---------+----------------+-------------+----------|
| 394718 | 4796 | 1.21504 | 464829 | 7531 | 1.62017 | 48.3761 | 42.6397 | 0.453271 |
Also notice the missmatch of the number of points.
Can you share the procedure of how you created the ground truth map? Are there any steps I missed, such as additional transformations, ruling out particular points, etc.
Thank you very much!
Zinuo
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
thank you for your open source code.
I would like to contribute a python evaluation pipeline that can take in maps as NumPy array and convert it to voxelized pointcloud in pcd file, which can be further sent into your "analysis_py3.py" script. So as a sanity check, I build up a gt map based on frames 00 (4390 - 4530) and run the script, but the result is awful. I checked your "mapgen.hpp" and this is how I built the map:
voxelize_preserving_labels
function in "erasor_utils.cpp", where I replace the intensity of voxelized points with the intensity of their nearest neighbor after voxelization with size 0.2.Since I do not filter out any points, I expect to have a result like ~100% preservation (all static point remains) and ~0 rejection (no dynamic point removed at all). However, I got a result like:
| # stat. pts | # dyn. pts | % | # est. stat. pts | # est. dyn. pts | % | Preservation | rejection | F1 |
|---------------+--------------+---------+--------------------+-------------------+---------+----------------+-------------+----------|
| 394718 | 4796 | 1.21504 | 464829 | 7531 | 1.62017 | 48.3761 | 42.6397 | 0.453271 |
Also notice the missmatch of the number of points.
Can you share the procedure of how you created the ground truth map? Are there any steps I missed, such as additional transformations, ruling out particular points, etc.
Thank you very much!
Zinuo
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: