CustomLayer component #41
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several changes across multiple Svelte components and markdown files. A new example for a custom layer is added to the navigation structure, and the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/content/examples/custom-protocol/content.svelte.md (1)
Line range hint
1-15: Overall changes look good with a suggestion for consistencyThe changes align well with the PR objectives of updating component names and enhancing the example documentation. However, consider maintaining consistency between file names and component names to improve maintainability.
Consider either:
- Renaming the file to
Demo.svelteto match the component name, or- Keeping the component name as
CustomProtocolto match the file nameThis would make the codebase more intuitive and easier to navigate.
src/content/examples/custom-control/content.svelte.md (1)
7-7: Consider renaming the file to match the component nameThe component is imported as
Demobut the file is still namedCustomControl.svelte. This creates a disconnect between the file name and its contents.Consider renaming the file to
Demo.svelteto maintain consistency and improve maintainability. This would require updating the import path:-import Demo from "./CustomControl.svelte"; +import Demo from "./Demo.svelte";src/routes/examples/+layout.svelte (1)
7-7: Consider enhancing responsive layout handlingWhile the layout works well for larger screens, consider adding responsive breakpoints to handle smaller viewport sizes where a 200px sidebar might be too constraining.
- <div class="mx-auto grid grid-cols-[200px_minmax(0,1fr)] gap-10 px-8 2xl:container"> + <div class="mx-auto grid grid-cols-1 gap-4 px-4 sm:gap-6 sm:px-6 md:grid-cols-[200px_minmax(0,1fr)] md:gap-10 md:px-8 2xl:container">src/content/examples/custom-layer/CustomLayer.svelte (1)
49-49: Remove unnecessary console.log statementThe
console.logstatement logginghelsinki,berlin, andkyivappears to be for debugging purposes. Consider removing it to clean up console output.Apply this diff to remove the
console.logstatement:- console.log(helsinki, berlin, kyiv);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
src/content/examples/Index.svelte(1 hunks)src/content/examples/custom-control/content.svelte.md(1 hunks)src/content/examples/custom-layer/CustomLayer.svelte(1 hunks)src/content/examples/custom-layer/content.svelte.md(1 hunks)src/content/examples/custom-protocol/content.svelte.md(1 hunks)src/lib/maplibre/index.ts(1 hunks)src/lib/maplibre/layers/CustomLayer.svelte(1 hunks)src/routes/components/+layout.svelte(1 hunks)src/routes/components/[slug]/+page.svelte(1 hunks)src/routes/examples/+layout.svelte(1 hunks)src/routes/examples/[slug]/+page.svelte(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/content/examples/custom-layer/content.svelte.md
🔇 Additional comments (9)
src/content/examples/custom-protocol/content.svelte.md (3)
7-7: Verify file naming consistency
The import statement suggests a mismatch between the file name (CustomProtocol.svelte) and the imported component name (Demo). This could lead to confusion.
10-10: Verify props setup and typing
The shiki prop is destructured from $props(), but we should ensure proper typing and availability.
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional scripts to check for the shiki prop typing and imports.
The previous results showed consistent usage of shiki prop across multiple content files, but we need to verify its typing and import source to ensure proper setup.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Props setup is properly configured
The shiki prop is correctly typed and imported in the codebase:
- Type is properly defined in
CodeBlock.svelteasHighlighterCorefrom 'shiki' - The prop is consistently used across content files
- The
$props()function is available and used throughout the codebase - The shiki highlighter is properly initialized in the page components
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for $props() usage and typing
# Expected: Find type definitions and other usages
# Search for $props usage patterns
echo "Searching for $props usage patterns:"
rg -A 2 "\\\$props\(\)" src/
# Search for shiki prop definitions
echo "Searching for shiki prop definitions:"
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ { shiki: $_ }'
Length of output: 20525
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for shiki-related imports and type definitions
echo "Searching for shiki imports and types:"
rg -A 2 "import.*shiki" src/
# Check CodeBlock component since it's likely where shiki is used
echo "Checking CodeBlock component:"
cat src/content/CodeBlock.svelte
# Check for any .d.ts files that might contain shiki types
echo "Searching for type definitions:"
fd -e d.ts -x cat {}
Length of output: 2596
13-15: Verify component props requirements
The changes look good, but let's ensure:
- The
Democomponent doesn't require any props - The
CodeBlockcomponent properly handles theshikiprop
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results from our verification attempts, I can generate the final response:
Components usage appears correct
The verification shows that:
- The
CodeBlockcomponent properly handles theshikiprop as seen in its implementation, using it for syntax highlighting. - The
Democomponent is consistently used without props across multiple example files, suggesting it's designed to work without props. - The pattern
<Demo />followed by<CodeBlock content={demoRaw} {shiki} />is used consistently throughout the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check component prop requirements
# Expected: Find component definitions and prop requirements
# Search for Demo component definition
echo "Searching for Demo component definition:"
ast-grep --pattern 'export let $_: $_'
# Search for CodeBlock shiki prop usage
echo "Searching for CodeBlock shiki prop usage:"
rg -A 5 "export let shiki" src/
Length of output: 258
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find component definitions and their props
# Search for Demo component file
echo "Searching for Demo component file:"
fd -e svelte -e ts -e js Demo
# Search for CodeBlock component file
echo "Searching for CodeBlock component file:"
fd -e svelte -e ts -e js CodeBlock
# Once we find the files, let's examine their content
echo "\nSearching for prop definitions in components:"
rg "export let" --type svelte --type typescript --type javascript
# Look for Demo component usage patterns
echo "\nSearching for Demo component usage patterns:"
rg "<Demo" --type svelte --type markdown -C 2
Length of output: 651
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try without file type restrictions since 'svelte' type isn't recognized
# First, let's check the content of the Demo component
echo "Checking Demo component content:"
cat src/content/examples/custom-protocol/Demo.svelte
# Check CodeBlock component content
echo "\nChecking CodeBlock component content:"
cat src/content/CodeBlock.svelte
# Look for Demo component usage without file type restrictions
echo "\nSearching for Demo component usage patterns:"
rg "<Demo" -C 2
# Look for export let declarations without file type restrictions
echo "\nSearching for prop definitions:"
rg "export let"
Length of output: 7873
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to find the Demo component in the examples directory
echo "Looking for Demo.svelte in examples directories:"
fd Demo.svelte src/content/examples
# If found, let's check its content
echo "\nChecking content of Demo components:"
fd Demo.svelte src/content/examples -x cat {}
# Let's also check if there are any props being used in the Demo components
echo "\nChecking for props usage in Demo components:"
fd Demo.svelte src/content/examples -x grep -l "export let"
Length of output: 446
src/content/examples/custom-control/content.svelte.md (1)
10-10: LGTM: Props destructuring is correctly implemented
The shiki prop destructuring follows Svelte's best practices for accessing component props.
src/routes/components/+layout.svelte (1)
7-7: LGTM: Grid container adjustment looks good
The reduction of the sidebar width from 220px to 200px maintains the responsive layout while providing a slightly more compact navigation area.
src/routes/components/[slug]/+page.svelte (1)
5-5: LGTM! Verify sidebar content fits.
The grid column width adjustment aligns with the PR objectives to standardize layout dimensions. However, please verify that all sidebar content (including the "On This Page" navigation) fits comfortably within the reduced 200px width across different components.
✅ Verification successful
LGTM! The sidebar width is consistent across layouts.
The verification shows that the 200px width is already being used consistently across the codebase:
- The main layout uses
grid-cols-[200px_minmax(0,1fr)]for the overall page structure - Component and example pages use
grid-cols-[1fr_200px]for their content areas - The sidebar content is simple, containing only "On This Page" navigation with standard text elements
The change aligns with the existing layout patterns and doesn't pose any content overflow risks.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential content overflow in sidebar navigation
# Look for long headings or content that might wrap awkwardly in the sidebar
# Search for heading patterns in markdown content
rg -g '*.md' -g '*.svelte' '^#{1,6}\s.{40,}' --with-filename
# Search for ToC/navigation related components that might be affected
ast-grep --pattern 'aside class="sticky' -A 10
Length of output: 111
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find sidebar content and navigation patterns
# Look for sidebar-related elements and their content
rg -g '*.svelte' 'aside|nav|sidebar' -B 2 -A 5
# Search for any grid layout definitions that might be related
rg -g '*.svelte' 'grid-cols-\[.*\]' --with-filename
# Look for any table of contents or navigation components
fd -e svelte -e ts -e js -X rg -l "TableOfContents|ToC|Navigation"
Length of output: 6941
src/routes/examples/[slug]/+page.svelte (1)
5-5: LGTM! Consider verifying responsive behavior.
The grid column width adjustment aligns with the layout standardization mentioned in the PR objectives. The structure maintains a good balance between the flexible content area and the sidebar.
Let's verify if this layout change is consistently applied across other similar files:
✅ Verification successful
Layout width is consistently applied across the codebase
The grid column width of 200px is uniformly used across all relevant layout files:
src/routes/examples/[slug]/+page.sveltesrc/routes/examples/+layout.sveltesrc/routes/components/+layout.sveltesrc/routes/components/[slug]/+page.svelte
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent grid column width across layout files
# Expected: All relevant layout files should use the same 200px width
# Search for grid-cols with pixel values
rg -U "grid-cols-\[.*?\d+px\]" --type svelte
Length of output: 77
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for grid-cols patterns in all files since the file type is not recognized
rg -U "grid-cols-\[.*?\d+px\]"
Length of output: 362
src/content/examples/Index.svelte (1)
24-25: LGTM! The navigation entry is well-structured.
The new custom layer example is logically placed alongside other custom-related examples, following consistent naming and path patterns.
Let's verify that the referenced path exists:
✅ Verification successful
Navigation entry and referenced path are valid
The verification confirms that both the example directory (src/content/examples/custom-layer/) and its content file (content.svelte.md) exist in the expected location, making this a valid navigation entry.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the custom layer example path exists
# Expected: The path should exist and contain required files
# Check if the example directory and its content exists
fd -t d "custom-layer$" src/content/examples/
fd -t f "content.svelte.md$" src/content/examples/custom-layer/
Length of output: 200
src/lib/maplibre/index.ts (1)
35-35: LGTM! Verify the CustomLayer component file exists.
The export is correctly placed in the layers section and follows the established pattern. The change aligns with the PR objective of implementing CustomLayerInterface support.
Let's verify the component file exists:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: CustomLayer component exists and is properly implemented
The component file exists at the expected location and follows the correct structure:
- Implements a Svelte component with TypeScript support
- Properly integrates with MapLibre's CustomLayerInterface
- Includes all necessary layer event handlers
- Handles layer lifecycle (addition, movement, removal)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the CustomLayer component file exists and follows the expected structure
# Expected: File exists and exports a Svelte component
# Check if the file exists
fd "CustomLayer.svelte" src/lib/maplibre/layers/
# Verify it's a Svelte component by checking for script and/or template tags
rg -U "(?s)<script.*?>.*?</script>|<template.*?>.*?</template>" src/lib/maplibre/layers/CustomLayer.svelte
Length of output: 2867
| <Demo /> | ||
|
|
||
| <CodeBlock content={demoRaw} /> | ||
| <CodeBlock content={demoRaw} {shiki} /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Component renaming is correct, but shiki prop syntax needs standardization
The verification shows:
- The
CustomControlcomponent is correctly used within its own example directory (src/content/examples/custom-control/) - The
shikiprop is used consistently across all example files, but with two different syntaxes:- Most files use
shiki={shiki} - Only
custom-protocolandcustom-controluse the shorthand{shiki}
- Most files use
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify consistent component naming across examples
The component renaming and shiki prop addition appear correct. Let's verify this pattern is consistently applied across other example files.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistency in component naming and shiki prop usage across example files
# Check for any remaining CustomControl references
echo "Checking for remaining CustomControl references:"
rg "CustomControl" "src/content/examples"
# Check for consistent CodeBlock shiki prop usage
echo "Checking CodeBlock shiki prop usage:"
rg "<CodeBlock" "src/content/examples"
Length of output: 3227
| <aside class="sticky bottom-0 top-16 h-[calc(100vh-4rem)] overflow-scroll py-8"> | ||
| <Index /> | ||
| </aside> | ||
| <main class="grid-cols-[1fr_220px]"> | ||
| <main class="grid-cols-[1fr_200px]"> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove unnecessary grid-cols from main element
The grid-cols-[1fr_200px] class on the <main> element appears unnecessary as it's not displaying a grid layout and its children are rendered directly. This could be confusing for maintenance.
- <main class="grid-cols-[1fr_200px]">
+ <main>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <main class="grid-cols-[1fr_200px]"> | |
| <main> |
| <aside class="sticky bottom-0 top-16 h-[calc(100vh-4rem)] overflow-scroll py-8"> | ||
| <Index /> | ||
| </aside> | ||
| <main class="grid-cols-[1fr_220px]"> | ||
| <main class="grid-cols-[1fr_200px]"> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
The grid-cols class on the main element is missing the grid class
The main element has grid-cols-[1fr_200px] but lacks the required grid class to activate the grid layout. This is inconsistent with both:
- The parent element which correctly uses
grid grid-cols-[200px_minmax(0,1fr)] - The child page component which correctly uses
grid grid-cols-[1fr_200px]
Either:
- Add the
gridclass if you want to maintain the grid layout:class="grid grid-cols-[1fr_200px]" - Remove the
grid-cols-[1fr_200px]class if no grid layout is needed
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the grid configuration in the main element
The grid columns defined on the main element (grid-cols-[1fr_200px]) appear to be unused as there are no visible grid items. Additionally, this configuration differs from the parent grid's structure. Consider:
- Removing the grid columns if they're not needed
- Aligning with the parent grid's configuration if a grid is required
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any grid items or content that might justify the grid columns in main
rg -l 'col-span-|col-start-' src/routes/components/
Length of output: 53
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the layout file and its surrounding context
cat src/routes/components/+layout.svelte
# Also search for any grid-related classes in the components directory
rg "grid-" src/routes/components/ -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 1466
| }); | ||
| </script> | ||
|
|
||
| {@render children?.()} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct the rendering of child content
The syntax {@render children?.()} is not valid in Svelte. To render child content or slots, you should use <slot /> or directly invoke the function if children is a render function.
Apply this diff to fix the rendering:
-{@render children?.()}
+{#if children}
+ {children()}
+{/if}Alternatively, if you intend to use slots, consider replacing children with <slot />:
-{@render children?.()}
+<slot />📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| {@render children?.()} | |
| {#if children} | |
| {children()} | |
| {/if} |
| {@render children?.()} | |
| <slot /> |
| (implementation as maplibregl.CustomLayerInterface).id ??= id; | ||
| (implementation as maplibregl.CustomLayerInterface).type = 'custom'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid mutating the implementation object directly
Mutating the implementation object by adding or modifying properties like id and type may lead to unintended side effects, especially if the object is used elsewhere. Consider creating a new object to prevent potential issues.
Apply this diff to create a new implementation object:
-(implementation as maplibregl.CustomLayerInterface).id ??= id;
-(implementation as maplibregl.CustomLayerInterface).type = 'custom';
+
+const layerImplementation: maplibregl.CustomLayerInterface = {
+ ...implementation,
+ id: implementation.id ?? id,
+ type: 'custom',
+};And update the addLayer call:
-mapCtx.addLayer(implementation as maplibregl.CustomLayerInterface, beforeId);
+mapCtx.addLayer(layerImplementation, beforeId);Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| interface Props extends MapLayerEventProps { | ||
| id?: string; | ||
| beforeId?: string; | ||
| implementation: Omit<maplibregl.CustomLayerInterface, 'id' | 'type'>; | ||
| children?: Snippet; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| let { | ||
| id: _id, | ||
| beforeId, | ||
| implementation, | ||
| children, | ||
|
|
||
| // Events | ||
| // https://maplibre.org/maplibre-gl-js/docs/API/type-aliases/MapLayerEventType/ | ||
| onclick, | ||
| ondblclick, | ||
| onmousedown, | ||
| onmouseup, | ||
| onmousemove, | ||
| onmouseenter, | ||
| onmouseleave, | ||
| onmouseover, | ||
| onmouseout, | ||
| oncontextmenu, | ||
| ontouchstart, | ||
| ontouchend, | ||
| ontouchcancel | ||
| }: Props = $props(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix props declaration to align with Svelte's syntax
The current props declaration using $props() is not standard in Svelte and may cause syntax errors. In Svelte, you should use export let to declare component props.
Apply this diff to correct the props declaration:
-interface Props extends MapLayerEventProps {
- id?: string;
- beforeId?: string;
- implementation: Omit<maplibregl.CustomLayerInterface, 'id' | 'type'>;
- children?: Snippet;
-}
-
-let {
- id: _id,
- beforeId,
- implementation,
- children,
-
- // Events
- // https://maplibre.org/maplibre-gl-js/docs/API/type-aliases/MapLayerEventType/
- onclick,
- ondblclick,
- onmousedown,
- onmouseup,
- onmousemove,
- onmouseenter,
- onmouseleave,
- onmouseover,
- onmouseout,
- oncontextmenu,
- ontouchstart,
- ontouchend,
- ontouchcancel
-}: Props = $props();
+export let id: string | undefined;
+const _id = id;
+export let beforeId: string | undefined;
+export let implementation: Omit<maplibregl.CustomLayerInterface, 'id' | 'type'>;
+export let children: Snippet | undefined;
+
+// Events
+// https://maplibre.org/maplibre-gl-js/docs/API/type-aliases/MapLayerEventType/
+export let onclick;
+export let ondblclick;
+export let onmousedown;
+export let onmouseup;
+export let onmousemove;
+export let onmouseenter;
+export let onmouseleave;
+export let onmouseover;
+export let onmouseout;
+export let oncontextmenu;
+export let ontouchstart;
+export let ontouchend;
+export let ontouchcancel;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| interface Props extends MapLayerEventProps { | |
| id?: string; | |
| beforeId?: string; | |
| implementation: Omit<maplibregl.CustomLayerInterface, 'id' | 'type'>; | |
| children?: Snippet; | |
| } | |
| let { | |
| id: _id, | |
| beforeId, | |
| implementation, | |
| children, | |
| // Events | |
| // https://maplibre.org/maplibre-gl-js/docs/API/type-aliases/MapLayerEventType/ | |
| onclick, | |
| ondblclick, | |
| onmousedown, | |
| onmouseup, | |
| onmousemove, | |
| onmouseenter, | |
| onmouseleave, | |
| onmouseover, | |
| onmouseout, | |
| oncontextmenu, | |
| ontouchstart, | |
| ontouchend, | |
| ontouchcancel | |
| }: Props = $props(); | |
| export let id: string | undefined; | |
| const _id = id; | |
| export let beforeId: string | undefined; | |
| export let implementation: Omit<maplibregl.CustomLayerInterface, 'id' | 'type'>; | |
| export let children: Snippet | undefined; | |
| // Events | |
| // https://maplibre.org/maplibre-gl-js/docs/API/type-aliases/MapLayerEventType/ | |
| export let onclick; | |
| export let ondblclick; | |
| export let onmousedown; | |
| export let onmouseup; | |
| export let onmousemove; | |
| export let onmouseenter; | |
| export let onmouseleave; | |
| export let onmouseover; | |
| export let onmouseout; | |
| export let oncontextmenu; | |
| export let ontouchstart; | |
| export let ontouchend; | |
| export let ontouchcancel; |
| render(gl: WebGL2RenderingContext | WebGLRenderingContext, options: maplibregl.CustomRenderMethodInput) { | ||
| gl.useProgram(this.program); | ||
| gl.uniformMatrix4fv( | ||
| gl.getUniformLocation(this.program!, 'u_matrix'), | ||
| false, | ||
| options.defaultProjectionData.mainMatrix | ||
| ); | ||
| gl.bindBuffer(gl.ARRAY_BUFFER, this.buffer); | ||
| gl.enableVertexAttribArray(this.aPos); | ||
| gl.vertexAttribPointer(this.aPos, 2, gl.FLOAT, false, 0, 0); | ||
| gl.enable(gl.BLEND); | ||
| gl.blendFunc(gl.SRC_ALPHA, gl.ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA); | ||
| gl.drawArrays(gl.TRIANGLE_STRIP, 0, 3); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure compatibility with WebGL1 contexts
The render method accepts both WebGL2RenderingContext and WebGLRenderingContext, but the shaders use WebGL2-specific features (e.g., #version 300 es). If the context is WebGL1, the shaders will fail to compile. Please ensure that the application handles cases where gl is a WebGL1 context or enforce that a WebGL2 context is used.
Consider updating the code to check if gl is a WebGL2RenderingContext and handle accordingly.
| const vertexShader = gl.createShader(gl.VERTEX_SHADER)!; | ||
| gl.shaderSource(vertexShader, vertexSource); | ||
| gl.compileShader(vertexShader); | ||
|
|
||
| // create a fragment shader | ||
| const fragmentShader = gl.createShader(gl.FRAGMENT_SHADER)!; | ||
| gl.shaderSource(fragmentShader, fragmentSource); | ||
| gl.compileShader(fragmentShader); | ||
|
|
||
| // link the two shaders into a WebGL program | ||
| this.program = gl.createProgram()!; | ||
| gl.attachShader(this.program, vertexShader); | ||
| gl.attachShader(this.program, fragmentShader); | ||
| gl.linkProgram(this.program); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for shader compilation and program linking
To ensure the robustness of the application, it's important to check if the shaders compile successfully and if the program links correctly. Without these checks, shader compilation or linking failures may go unnoticed, making debugging difficult.
Apply this diff to add error handling:
gl.compileShader(vertexShader);
+if (!gl.getShaderParameter(vertexShader, gl.COMPILE_STATUS)) {
+ console.error('Vertex shader compilation failed:', gl.getShaderInfoLog(vertexShader));
+}
gl.compileShader(fragmentShader);
+if (!gl.getShaderParameter(fragmentShader, gl.COMPILE_STATUS)) {
+ console.error('Fragment shader compilation failed:', gl.getShaderInfoLog(fragmentShader));
+}
gl.linkProgram(this.program);
+if (!gl.getProgramParameter(this.program, gl.LINK_STATUS)) {
+ console.error('Program linking failed:', gl.getProgramInfoLog(this.program));
+}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const vertexShader = gl.createShader(gl.VERTEX_SHADER)!; | |
| gl.shaderSource(vertexShader, vertexSource); | |
| gl.compileShader(vertexShader); | |
| // create a fragment shader | |
| const fragmentShader = gl.createShader(gl.FRAGMENT_SHADER)!; | |
| gl.shaderSource(fragmentShader, fragmentSource); | |
| gl.compileShader(fragmentShader); | |
| // link the two shaders into a WebGL program | |
| this.program = gl.createProgram()!; | |
| gl.attachShader(this.program, vertexShader); | |
| gl.attachShader(this.program, fragmentShader); | |
| gl.linkProgram(this.program); | |
| const vertexShader = gl.createShader(gl.VERTEX_SHADER)!; | |
| gl.shaderSource(vertexShader, vertexSource); | |
| gl.compileShader(vertexShader); | |
| if (!gl.getShaderParameter(vertexShader, gl.COMPILE_STATUS)) { | |
| console.error('Vertex shader compilation failed:', gl.getShaderInfoLog(vertexShader)); | |
| } | |
| // create a fragment shader | |
| const fragmentShader = gl.createShader(gl.FRAGMENT_SHADER)!; | |
| gl.shaderSource(fragmentShader, fragmentSource); | |
| gl.compileShader(fragmentShader); | |
| if (!gl.getShaderParameter(fragmentShader, gl.COMPILE_STATUS)) { | |
| console.error('Fragment shader compilation failed:', gl.getShaderInfoLog(fragmentShader)); | |
| } | |
| // link the two shaders into a WebGL program | |
| this.program = gl.createProgram()!; | |
| gl.attachShader(this.program, vertexShader); | |
| gl.attachShader(this.program, fragmentShader); | |
| gl.linkProgram(this.program); | |
| if (!gl.getProgramParameter(this.program, gl.LINK_STATUS)) { | |
| console.error('Program linking failed:', gl.getProgramInfoLog(this.program)); | |
| } |
Deploying svelte-maplibre-gl with
|
| Latest commit: |
14fb32c
|
| Status: | ⚡️ Build in progress... |
Close #27
Summary by Copilot
This pull request introduces a new custom layer example and makes several updates to existing examples and layout styles. The most important changes include the addition of a custom layer example, updates to the import statements and component names, and adjustments to the layout grid dimensions.
New Custom Layer Example:
src/content/examples/custom-layer/CustomLayer.svelte: Added a new custom layer implementation using WebGL to render custom content on a map.src/content/examples/custom-layer/content.svelte.md: Added documentation for the new custom layer example.src/lib/maplibre/layers/CustomLayer.svelte: Created a new Svelte component for the custom layer.src/lib/maplibre/index.ts: Exported the newCustomLayercomponent.Updates to Existing Examples:
src/content/examples/custom-control/content.svelte.md: Updated import statements and component names for consistency.src/content/examples/custom-protocol/content.svelte.md: Updated import statements and component names for consistency.Layout Adjustments:
src/routes/components/+layout.svelte: Adjusted the grid column dimensions for better layout.src/routes/components/[slug]/+page.svelte: Adjusted the grid column dimensions for better layout. (src/routes/components/[slug]/+page.svelteL5-R5)src/routes/examples/+layout.svelte: Adjusted the grid column dimensions for better layout.src/routes/examples/[slug]/+page.svelte: Adjusted the grid column dimensions for better layout. (src/routes/components/[slug]/+page.svelteL5-R5)Miscellaneous:
src/content/examples/Index.svelte: Added a new entry for the custom layer example in the examples index.Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
CustomLayercomponent for enhanced map rendering using MapLibre GL.Improvements
CustomControlandCustomProtocoltoDemofor clarity.Layout Adjustments
MapLibrecomponent from60vhto55vhacross various examples for improved visual consistency.