-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update devDependencies, including Vite 6 #47
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Deploying svelte-maplibre-gl with
|
Latest commit: |
0ca914a
|
Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
Preview URL: | https://45a25249.svelte-maplibre-gl.pages.dev |
Branch Preview URL: | https://update-deps-20241201.svelte-maplibre-gl.pages.dev |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
package.json (1)
Line range hint
55-89
: Consider a phased rollout approach for these dependency updatesGiven the scope of changes, especially the major version updates to core build tools:
High-risk updates:
- Vite 6.0.1 (major)
- @sveltejs/vite-plugin-svelte 5.0.1 (major)
Medium-risk updates:
- bits-ui 1.0.0-next.65 (pre-release)
- three.js 0.171.0 (minor)
Low-risk updates:
- ESLint and related plugins
- Other minor version bumps
Recommended approach:
- Split these updates into separate PRs based on risk level
- Start with low-risk updates
- Test extensively in a staging environment
- Consider adding integration tests specifically for build output integrity
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yaml
is excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
package.json
(2 hunks)src/lib/components/ui/dropdown-menu/dropdown-menu-content.svelte
(1 hunks)src/lib/components/ui/select/select-content.svelte
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
src/lib/components/ui/dropdown-menu/dropdown-menu-content.svelte (2)
8-8
: LGTM: Type-safe props extension
The addition of optional portalProps
is well-typed and maintains backward compatibility.
Also applies to: 11-13
16-26
: Verify portal rendering behavior
The Portal wrapper could affect the component's rendering position in the DOM hierarchy. Please ensure this change doesn't break existing dropdown positioning or z-index stacking in various usage scenarios.
Run the following to find all usages of this component:
Consider documenting this architectural change in the component's documentation, as it affects where the content is rendered in the DOM.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to find usages and understand the context better. The previous command failed because the file type 'svelte' wasn't recognized. I'm now using a more generic HTML search and also looking for the file directly.
I'm trying to find any usage of the DropdownMenu components and understand the Portal implementation better, as the previous searches didn't reveal direct usages of the content component.
I want to examine a real usage example and understand the component's structure before making a final determination about the Portal implementation.
Portal implementation is safe and follows established patterns
The Portal implementation is a standard pattern using bits-ui's DropdownMenu primitive, and the current usage in DarkModeSelector.svelte demonstrates proper implementation. The Portal is properly configured with:
- Correct component hierarchy (Root -> Content -> Portal)
- Appropriate z-index (z-50) for proper stacking
- Animation and positioning classes for various states
- Proper export structure through the component's index.ts
The Portal wrapper is actually part of the bits-ui primitive and is being used as intended, making this a safe and reliable implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find all instances where this component is used
rg -l "dropdown-menu-content" --type svelte
Length of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find all instances where this component is used, searching for both the component name and potential imports
rg -l -t html "dropdown-menu-content|DropdownMenuContent"
# Also search for the file directly to understand its location and content
fd -e svelte "dropdown-menu-content"
Length of output: 161
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for any usage of the DropdownMenu component or imports
rg -l "DropdownMenu|from.*dropdown-menu"
# Also check the content of the component file to understand the Portal implementation
cat src/lib/components/ui/dropdown-menu/dropdown-menu-content.svelte
Length of output: 1725
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual usage in DarkModeSelector to understand the implementation
cat src/routes/DarkModeSelector.svelte
# Also check the index.ts to understand the component's exports and structure
cat src/lib/components/ui/dropdown-menu/index.ts
Length of output: 2635
src/lib/components/ui/select/select-content.svelte (2)
11-11
: LGTM: Consistent with dropdown-menu implementation
The portalProps
addition follows the same pattern as dropdown-menu-content, maintaining consistency across components.
Also applies to: 14-16
19-19
: Verify select behavior with portal
The Portal addition maintains the existing select functionality while potentially improving overlay positioning. However, verify that the scroll buttons and viewport still work correctly with the portal.
package.json (4)
65-65
: LGTM: Safe linting dependency updates
The updates to ESLint and related plugins are minor version bumps that should not introduce breaking changes.
Also applies to: 67-67
86-86
: Verify three.js changelog for potential rendering impacts
The update to three.js (0.170.0 → 0.171.0) may affect 3D visualization features.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the three.js usage in the codebase to better understand the potential impact.
Three.js update impact is minimal and isolated
The codebase has limited three.js usage, confined to a single example component (src/content/examples/threejs-model/CustomLayer.svelte
). The implementation uses basic three.js features (Camera, Scene, WebGLRenderer, DirectionalLight) that are stable across minor versions. Since this is an example component and not part of the core functionality, the version update from 0.170.0 to 0.171.0 poses minimal risk.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for three.js changes
echo "Checking three.js changelog..."
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mrdoob/three.js/dev/CHANGELOG.md | grep -A 10 "r171"
# Look for three.js usage in the codebase
echo "Checking three.js usage..."
rg "from 'three'" -A 5
Length of output: 896
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any three.js specific features or methods being used
echo "Checking for specific three.js features usage..."
rg "THREE\." -A 3
# Look for any 3D rendering or scene setup code
echo "Checking for 3D scene setup..."
rg "Scene|Camera|Renderer" -A 3
# Check for any configuration or setup files related to three.js
echo "Looking for three.js related configuration..."
fd -e js -e ts -e json -e svelte . | xargs rg "three" -l
Length of output: 3647
63-63
: Consider stability implications of pre-release dependencies
The update to [email protected]
maintains use of pre-release versions. While this aligns with the portal functionality changes mentioned in the PR summary, pre-release versions may introduce instability.
Consider:
- Monitoring the bits-ui repository for stability updates
- Having a rollback plan if issues arise
- Documenting the pre-release dependency status in your README
55-55
:
The update includes significant version changes in core build tools:
- Vite: 5.4.11 → 6.0.1 (major)
- @sveltejs/vite-plugin-svelte: 4.0.2 → 5.0.1 (major)
These updates require careful testing as they may introduce breaking changes.
Consider:
- Running the full test suite to verify build process
- Testing in both dev and production modes
- Reviewing the Vite 6 migration guide
Also applies to: 57-57, 89-89
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the compatibility and potential issues.
Let me check the vite.config.ts file to understand the current configuration and any potential compatibility issues.
✅ The Vite and SvelteKit updates appear safe to proceed
The verification shows:
- Simple, standard Vite configuration using SvelteKit's official plugin
- No custom Vite plugins or complex configurations that could break
- Using Vitest for testing, which is officially supported by Vite 6
- SvelteKit's vite plugin (@sveltejs/kit/vite) is designed to handle Vite version compatibility
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for migration guides and breaking changes
echo "Checking Vite 6 migration guide..."
curl -s https://vitejs.dev/guide/migration.html
# Verify SvelteKit compatibility with Vite 6
echo "Checking SvelteKit compatibility..."
gh search issues "Vite 6 compatibility" repo:sveltejs/kit is:issue
Length of output: 404
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check package.json for any Vite-specific configurations
echo "Checking package.json for Vite config..."
cat package.json | jq '.scripts + .dependencies + .devDependencies'
# Look for vite.config.js/ts files
echo -e "\nChecking for Vite config files..."
fd -e js -e ts -g 'vite.config.*'
# Check if there are any direct imports of Vite-specific APIs
echo -e "\nChecking for Vite imports..."
rg "from ['|\"]vite['\"]" -A 2
# Check SvelteKit version compatibility in their package.json
echo -e "\nChecking SvelteKit's package.json for Vite peer dependency..."
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sveltejs/kit/master/package.json | jq '.peerDependencies'
Length of output: 2482
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check vite.config.ts content
echo "Checking vite.config.ts content..."
cat vite.config.ts
# Check for any Vite-specific plugins or configurations in the codebase
echo -e "\nChecking for Vite plugin usage..."
rg "defineConfig|plugin" vite.config.ts
# Check if there are any SvelteKit specific configurations
echo -e "\nChecking for SvelteKit configurations..."
rg "sveltekit" -i vite.config.ts
Length of output: 739
Summary by Copilot
This pull request includes updates to dependencies and enhancements to the dropdown and select components. The most important changes are the version updates in
package.json
and the addition ofportalProps
to thedropdown-menu-content.svelte
andselect-content.svelte
components.Dependency updates:
@sveltejs/kit
from^2.8.5
to^2.9.0
inpackage.json
.@sveltejs/vite-plugin-svelte
from^4.0.2
to^5.0.1
inpackage.json
.svelte
from^5.2.10
to^5.2.12
inpackage.json
.vite
from^5.4.11
to^6.0.1
inpackage.json
.three
from^0.170.0
to^0.171.0
inpackage.json
.Component enhancements:
portalProps
toDropdownMenuPrimitive.ContentProps
indropdown-menu-content.svelte
and wrapped the content withDropdownMenuPrimitive.Portal
to allow passing portal properties. [1] [2]portalProps
toSelectPrimitive.ContentProps
inselect-content.svelte
and modified the portal wrapping to include these properties.Summary by CodeRabbit
portalProps
for dropdown and select components, enhancing their configurability.