You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
New feature description in words:
RRIDs are identifiers in the SciCrunch database of research resources, e.g. https://zbmath.org/software/4557 (ggplot2) has one at https://scicrunch.org/resolver/RRID:SCR_014601 .
They are meant to be used primarily in papers, and if this is properly done, they facilitate mining for the corresponding resources, both by SciCrunch (which currently states "We found 25275 mentions in open access literature", while swMATH has "347 Documents" for it) and by others.
TODOS:
check which swMATH packages already have an entry in the RRID registry
The status quo is to ignore RRIDs. However, they are gaining traction in biomedicine and related fields, and registering math-related resources there in a systematic fashion increases the findability of these resources.
Checklist for this issue:
Participants in discussion have been invited as assignees
All fields of the issue have been filled
Example fields have been removed
The main MaRDI project has been assigned to this issue
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@Daniel-Mietchen do you have experience searching in this database?
For CRAN packages the best I have achieved is this: https://rrid.site/data/source/nlx_144509-1/search?q=CRAN&l=CRAN
where I get 211 hits for potential CRAN packages listed in SciCrunch.
But for the rest of swMath items we have in our knowledge graph, I don't know if there is a better alternative than just search by name individually. I was wondering if there would be some sort of SPARQL endpoint or equivalent to make the search more efficient.
New feature description in words:
RRIDs are identifiers in the SciCrunch database of research resources, e.g.
https://zbmath.org/software/4557 (ggplot2) has one at https://scicrunch.org/resolver/RRID:SCR_014601 .
They are meant to be used primarily in papers, and if this is properly done, they facilitate mining for the corresponding resources, both by SciCrunch (which currently states "We found 25275 mentions in open access literature", while swMATH has "347 Documents" for it) and by others.
TODOS:
Considered Alternatives:
Checklist for this issue:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: