-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
!want or !hunt command #54
Comments
An in-bot hunting list was something discussed a LOT in the early days of the bot and the discussion has sort of died down in recent months. Without saying too much about the positives and negatives, if we did do it there would still have to be some kind of limit to it, otherwise some mean people would just want-list things willy nilly to troll. |
Make it limited to 3 at a time per person? |
Maybe make a limit tied to handspace? |
Thats a nice idea. Tho people with 18 hand space will get 3 or 4? Would you round up after .5 or not? |
Hence i used a cast to (int) - meaning always rounding down. |
I'm not sold on this. |
I think the core issue this is trying to solve is people not joining the discord, to give them a chance to still work with the bot in that way. Having this in the bot itself doesn't require them to join the discord |
Would anybody not joining that place really be playing seriously enough into the TCG to warrant bending over backwards for a watered down version of !bounty, though? |
Since we have the !lookup command and now the !owners command, I'd suggest a way to bring the #tcg-hunting-room into the bot.
Make a command similiar to !bounty,
like !want or !hunt (!want 1972) where a person can set up a list of waifus they want and
a !wanted or !hunted command (eg !wanted 1972 shows: [1972][common] Emi Igawa from Shigatsu wa Kimi no Uso is wanted by Honbuk)
This does not replace !bounty and does not need handspace nor points, however it makes it easier for people to see if anyone actually wants a card they pulled.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: