-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy pathExecution_traces.txt
65 lines (52 loc) · 2.44 KB
/
Execution_traces.txt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
######################################################
Execution of LPTest.java number 1
######################################################
>> java LPTest
int[] testValue = { 10, 100, 1000, 10000 };
int[] sampleFreq = { 10 };
double[] cutoffFreq = { 0.25 };
Output:
Test value for value :10 Sample frequency: 10 Cutoff frequency: 0.25
Time for LPFilter1: 30100 nanoseconds
Time for LPFilter2: 31000 nanoseconds
--------------------------------------------------
Test value for value :100 Sample frequency: 10 Cutoff frequency: 0.25
Time for LPFilter1: 1211500 nanoseconds
Time for LPFilter2: 17300 nanoseconds
--------------------------------------------------
Test value for value :1000 Sample frequency: 10 Cutoff frequency: 0.25
Time for LPFilter1: 41399300 nanoseconds
Time for LPFilter2: 96100 nanoseconds
--------------------------------------------------
Test value for value :10000 Sample frequency: 10 Cutoff frequency: 0.25
Time for LPFilter1: 2624728700 nanoseconds
Time for LPFilter2: 822500 nanoseconds
--------------------------------------------------
Note:
As expected, the values seem relevant since they correspond to our hypothesis (longer execution time for LPFIlter1 but better quality observed upon being displayed).
######################################################
Execution of LPTest.java number 2
######################################################
>> java LPTest
int[] testValue = { 10, 100, 1000, 10000 };
int[] sampleFreq = { 50 };
double[] cutoffFreq = { 0.75 };
Output:
Test value for value :10 Sample frequency: 50 Cutoff frequency: 0.75
Time for LPFilter1: 49600 nanoseconds
Time for LPFilter2: 32700 nanoseconds
--------------------------------------------------
Test value for value :100 Sample frequency: 50 Cutoff frequency: 0.75
Time for LPFilter1: 1251100 nanoseconds
Time for LPFilter2: 14200 nanoseconds
--------------------------------------------------
Test value for value :1000 Sample frequency: 50 Cutoff frequency: 0.75
Time for LPFilter1: 45498900 nanoseconds
Time for LPFilter2: 113100 nanoseconds
--------------------------------------------------
Test value for value :10000 Sample frequency: 50 Cutoff frequency: 0.75
Time for LPFilter1: 2618355500 nanoseconds
Time for LPFilter2: 774800 nanoseconds
--------------------------------------------------
Note :
As expected, the values seem relevant since they correspond to our hypothesis (longer execution time for LPFIlter1 but better quality observed upon being displayed).