We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
n
In some of the studies, people are interested in filter AE by counts, rather than percentage. Currently, in forestly, when we filter counts, the upper limits is 100 (see https://github.com/Merck/forestly/blob/main/R/ae_forestly.R#L50 and https://github.com/Merck/forestly/blob/main/R/ae_forestly.R#L124). However, it is possible that, in some extreme cases, the counts can be greater than 100. Can we update the upper limits to allow the study's maximal counts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The upper limit for the slider bar is not always 100 under the current circumstances when filtering AE by count.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
In some of the studies, people are interested in filter AE by counts, rather than percentage. Currently, in forestly, when we filter counts, the upper limits is 100 (see https://github.com/Merck/forestly/blob/main/R/ae_forestly.R#L50 and https://github.com/Merck/forestly/blob/main/R/ae_forestly.R#L124). However, it is possible that, in some extreme cases, the counts can be greater than 100. Can we update the upper limits to allow the study's maximal counts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: