You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Alfalfa point write values are stored as an array of length 16, this mirrors a priority array like in building control systems. However, right now we do not have a way to write to only a specific priority in the array.
Should Alfalfa act as a controller and allow for priority array writes? or is that too low level?
If we used explicit priority arrays we could have multiple BACnet bridges in sync with the same priority arrays. And we could simulate this kind on hierarchical controls in Alfalfa.
This would require a way to query the input priority array with the API. Currently the API does not support querying the current input value for a point, only the output coming from E+.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Alfalfa point write values are stored as an array of length 16, this mirrors a priority array like in building control systems. However, right now we do not have a way to write to only a specific priority in the array.
Should Alfalfa act as a controller and allow for priority array writes? or is that too low level?
If we used explicit priority arrays we could have multiple BACnet bridges in sync with the same priority arrays. And we could simulate this kind on hierarchical controls in Alfalfa.
This would require a way to query the input priority array with the API. Currently the API does not support querying the current input value for a point, only the output coming from E+.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: