How to make xdrip+ receive two data at a time

[switchfish]

When using 640G/EverSense to broadcast data to xDrip, I can only receive one blood sugar data in five minutes, but my transmitter has one blood sugar data every three minutes. How can I make all the data be transmitted to xdrip through broadcast?

[Navid200]

xDrip is mainly based on one reading every 5 minutes.
We have a test feature here: #2680

I have no idea what will happen if a frequency higher than 1 every 5 minutes does not become the norm. If it does, meaning all manufacturers switch to it, I don't see why we wouldn't.
But, if only some manufacturers offer it as a differentiator because they cannot offer anything else to attract customers, I have no idea what will happen.

[switchfish]

Our products may be some of the manufacturers you mentioned. Of course, one point every three minutes will have more advantages than one point every five minutes.
During the test, I found that xdrip+ actually received the broadcast every three minutes, but it did not process and display the data. In this case, I considered sending two pieces of data every six minutes. Unfortunately, xdrip+ still did not process the middle piece of data. What should I do to ensure that all the data can be transmitted to xdrip+ and ensure the accuracy of the blood glucose point time?

[switchfish]

Nightscout's AndroidAPS can upload one point in three minutes. After the data is sent to nightscout, it takes three minutes to view the chart. Is there any consideration for xDrip+ that requires one point in five minutes?

[Navid200]

Let me try to explain a different way.
Let's say we add the ability to show one reading every minute.
Next month another company releases a new sensor that reads once every 30 seconds.
Should we then change xDrip to get one reading every 30 seconds?
When will you draw a line and say that OK after this any higher frequency is not going to add any more value?
Once every 20 seconds? Once every 10 seconds? Once a second? Once every millisecond? When will you accept that there is no value in increasing the number of readings?

Do you think that Dexcom flipped a coin to come up with one reading every 5 minutes? You can search and find the papers they published showing why they picked once every 5 minutes. That rate is more than adequate to satisfy the Nyquist rate for human blood glucose variation.

[switchfish]

we believe that you must be developing software in the most scientific way. Thank you very much for answering my questions, which has helped me understand CGM more deeply.