Statistics shows YTD vs 90-day difference

[Mocadon]

Just wondering if anyone can explain something. I started using xDrip+ about January 25th and today, February 28th, I noticed a significant difference between the YTD and the 90 Day statistics. I thought this was odd since either they should have been the same (days with no values not counted), or, the 90 day should have had a lower PGS than the YTD (days with no values counted as zero) when actually the 90 Day shows a much higher PGS. YTD PGS = 11.96 and 90 Day PGS = 27.29. The Time In Range, Mean BG, and CV are all also worse for the 90 Day statistics. Just wondering?

[Navid200]

I agree we may need to change the abbreviation YTD.

YTD in xDrip statistics stands for yesterday, not year to date.

The problem is there is no clearly well used and understood abbreviation for yesterday. Would everyone know YD is yesterday? I'm not sure.

[Mocadon]

Now that makes sense. Okay, got it 👍

[Mocadon]

I kinda like having a yesterday, I'd like a 14 Day to match Clarity, but I'd like lots of things, lol. YD might be better than YTD for yesterday. Thanks for the speedy answer 👍

[jonprogers]

@Mocadon the way I get 14 day summary data is to use the History rather than Statistics options - from there you can change 1 day to 14 days and step backwards and forwards in your data in 14 day chunks (so great for comparing different time periods). If you have the Extra Status Line enabled you can get most of the same stats that are available in the Statistics section.

I hope this makes sense...

[Mocadon]

Hey, that works great! Thanks very much! 👍