Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Link Loadouts with Equipment Sets #19

Open
DennisRas opened this issue May 28, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Feature Request: Link Loadouts with Equipment Sets #19

DennisRas opened this issue May 28, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@DennisRas
Copy link

DennisRas commented May 28, 2024

Would it be possible to link the loadouts with equipment sets?
The default UI lets you attach an equipment set for when you swap specs., so something similar but for loadouts in general?

Each loadout could have a dropdown option with the equipment sets as a list.

Unless there's a limitation to this in terms of activating the equipment sets.

@Numynum
Copy link
Member

Numynum commented May 28, 2024

I'm not generally interested in implementing various other loadout managing things

instead, someone can either use BtwLoadouts, or hook into the TLM API, to change equipment sets and whatever else they wish to change

I'll leave the tticket open, as I'm not strictly opposed to the idea, but unless someone else creates a PR for it, I don't see it happening this side of 2025 😉

@Numynum
Copy link
Member

Numynum commented May 28, 2024

doesn't help that I personally find the default equipment manager too limiting to be worth using 🙂, and then I'd have to implement <insert current favorite equipment addon>

@DennisRas
Copy link
Author

Thanks for the reply :-)

I wasn't aware that BtwLoadouts had that feature, so I can see the reason for not implementing it hehe.

The default equipment sets are indeed limited and I also considered the consequences of getting those involved

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants