(click for details)
The OBO Dashboard is a new feature under active development.
+The OBO Dashboard is being developed by the OBO Operations Committee and members of the Technical Working Group. Our goal is to provide a set of automated tests that establish a minimum level of compliance with OBO Principles and best practises. Keep in mind that automated checks often cannot capture the full intent of a given principle – we do our best while keeping the automated checks as fast and cheap as possible.
+For each ontology, two aspects are checked: the OBO Registry entry, and the latest release of the project’s main OWL file. For each check we provide links to the rule text and implementation.
+Please give us your feedback!
+This issue is for general comments, with links to the specific issue for each check.
+This is an alpha version of an automated representation of the OBO Foundry principles. Many of the principles contain a subjective aspect, making the checks difficult to implement. These checks are still in review and subject to change.
+The result of the OBO Foundry Dashboard is not a reflection of the quality of content of an ontology.
+It is simply a means to alert ontology developers to areas that may need review.
+The dashboard page contains a table with all results from all OBO Foundry ontologies. These results are sorted in the same order that the ontologies appear on the OBO Foundry homepage: foundry ontologies, active ontologies, orphaned, and finally obsolete ontologies.
+Each column after the ontology ID represents one dashboard check. There are four levels of results for each column:
+For details on what constitutes a pass versus an error for each check, click on the column header.
+The last column contains a summary of the dashboard check. This column corresponds to the lowest result of all checks. For example, if there are any errors, this column will contain a red x. Likewise, if there are any infos, but no errors or warnings, this column will contain a blue i.
+Finally, you can download the report summary as a YAML file from the link near the top of the page.
+To view more details on an ontology’s results, click on the ontology ID in the first column.
+From the dashboard report page, you can see the version IRI that the dashboard was run on (for all OWL file checks) and the date it was run. Some checks include reports, which you can view under the Resources column. Each individual report page includes a link to download those reports as TSV files.
+ROBOT report runs a series of standard queries over the OWL file. More details on these queries can be found here. Like the dashboard checks, report has three levels of violations (passing results are not shown in the table): info, warning, and error.
+Each row contains the violation level, the rule name (corresponding to a query), the subject of the violation, the property of the violation, and the value of the violation. For specific details on what the rule checks and how to fix it, click on the rule name.
+Analysis of the ontologies in the dashboard
+ +| syntax | +RDF/XML Syntax | +
|---|---|
| count | +1 | +
| + | count | +mean | +std | +min | +25% | +50% | +75% | +max | +
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AnnotationAssertion | +1 | +499.0 | +NaN | +499.0 | +499.0 | +499.0 | +499.0 | +499.0 | +
| AnnotationPropertyRangeOf | +1 | +1.0 | +NaN | +1.0 | +1.0 | +1.0 | +1.0 | +1.0 | +
| ClassAssertion | +1 | +19.0 | +NaN | +19.0 | +19.0 | +19.0 | +19.0 | +19.0 | +
| Declaration | +1 | +124.0 | +NaN | +124.0 | +124.0 | +124.0 | +124.0 | +124.0 | +
| DifferentIndividuals | +1 | +2.0 | +NaN | +2.0 | +2.0 | +2.0 | +2.0 | +2.0 | +
| EquivalentClasses | +1 | +3.0 | +NaN | +3.0 | +3.0 | +3.0 | +3.0 | +3.0 | +
| SubAnnotationPropertyOf | +1 | +18.0 | +NaN | +18.0 | +18.0 | +18.0 | +18.0 | +18.0 | +
| SubClassOf | +1 | +26.0 | +NaN | +26.0 | +26.0 | +26.0 | +26.0 | +26.0 | +
| + | count | +mean | +std | +min | +25% | +50% | +75% | +max | +
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class | +1 | +101.0 | +NaN | +101.0 | +101.0 | +101.0 | +101.0 | +101.0 | +
| ObjectOneOf | +1 | +3.0 | +NaN | +3.0 | +3.0 | +3.0 | +3.0 | +3.0 | +
| + | ontology | +score | +score_dash | +score_impact | +
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | +omo | +0.456 | +0.911 | +0.0 | +
| + | count | +mean | +std | +min | +25% | +50% | +75% | +max | +
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| score | +1.0 | +0.456 | +NaN | +0.456 | +0.456 | +0.456 | +0.456 | +0.456 | +
| score_dash | +1.0 | +0.911 | +NaN | +0.911 | +0.911 | +0.911 | +0.911 | +0.911 | +
| score_impact | +1.0 | +0.000 | +NaN | +0.000 | +0.000 | +0.000 | +0.000 | +0.000 | +
Created with ROBOT version 1.9.7 and OBO Metadata Schema.
+A very basic analysis of the results can be found here.
+| Ontology (click for details) |
+ + Open + | ++ Format + | ++ URIs + | ++ Versioning + | ++ Scope + | ++ Definitions + | ++ Relations + | ++ Documented + | ++ Users + | ++ Authority + | ++ Naming + | ++ Maintained + | ++ Responsiveness + | ++ ROBOT Report + | ++ Summary + | +
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| omo | + + + + + + + + + + |
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ |
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ |
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ |
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ |
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ |
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ |
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ |
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ |
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ |
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ |
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ |
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ |
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ |
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ |
+
+
+
Version: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/omo/releases/2024-11-13/omo.owl
+Date run: 2025-02-01 05:54:05.756240
+View dashboard results as YAML
+ +| Principle | +Automated Check | +Status | +Comment | +Resources | +
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open | +Open Automated Check | + + + + +
+ 
+ |
+
+ + + + | + + |
| Common Format | +Common Format Automated Check | + + + + +
+
+ |
+
+ + + + | + + |
| URIs | +URIs Automated Check | + + + + +
+
+ |
+
+ + + + | + + |
| Versioning | +Versioning Automated Check | + + + + +
+
+ |
+
+ + + + | + + |
| Scope | +Scope Automated Check | + + + + +
+
+ |
+
+ + + + | + + |
| Textual Definitions | +Textual Definitions Automated Check | + + + + +
+
+ |
+
+ + + + | + + |
| Relations | +Relations Automated Check | + + + + +
+
+ |
+
+ + + + | + + |
| Documented | +Documented Automated Check | + + + + +
+
+ |
+
+ + + + | + + |
| Plurality of Users | +Plurality of Users Automated Check | + + + + +
+
+ |
+
+ + + + | + + |
| Locus of Authority | +Locus of Authority Automated Check | + + + + +
+
+ |
+
+ + + + | + + |
| Naming Conventions | +Naming Conventions Automated Check | + + + + +
+
+ |
+
+ + + + | + + |
| Maintenance | +Maintenance Automated Check | + + + + +
+
+ |
+
+ + + + | + + |
| Responsiveness | +Responsiveness Automated Check | + + + + +
+
+ |
+
+ + + + | + + |
| Check | +Status | +Comment | +Resources | +
|---|---|---|---|
| ROBOT Report | + + + + +
+ 
+ |
+
+ 19 warnings, 0 info messages. | + + +View ROBOT Report | + +
| Metric | +Values | +
|---|---|
| Axioms: Breakdown of axiom types | + + +
+
|
+
+
| Axioms: Number of axioms | + + +692 | + +
| Entities: % of entities reused | + + +86.26 | + +
| Entities: Number of annotation properties | + + +81 | + +
| Entities: Number of classes | + + +27 | + +
| Entities: Number of data properties | + + +0 | + +
| Entities: Number of individuals | + + +20 | + +
| Entities: Number of object properties | + + +0 | + +
| Entities: Number of unsatisfiable classes | + + +0 | + +
| Info: Breakdown of OWL class expressions used | + + +
+
|
+
+
| Info: Does the ontology fall under OWL 2 DL? | + + +True | + +
| Info: Experimental OBO score | + + +
+
|
+
+
| Info: How many externally documented uses? | + + +1 | + +
| Info: How many ontologies use it? | + + +0 | + +
| Info: Logical consistency | + + +True | + +
| Info: Syntax | + + +RDF/XML Syntax | + +
| Info: Usage of namespaces in axioms | + + +
+
|
+
+
| Info: Which ontologies use it? | + + +
|
+
+
| Level | Number of errors |
|---|---|
| WARN | 19 |
| Rule | Number of errors |
|---|---|
| missing_xrefs | 18 |
| annotation_whitespace | 1 |
+ Click on any term to redirect to the term page. +
+ +| Row | + +Level | + +Rule Name | + +Subject | + +Property | + +Value | + +
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | +WARN | +annotation_whitespace | +OMO:0001002 | +IAO:0000116 | +This obsolesence reason should be used conservatively. For example: Obsoleting class that describes a breed of cow based on a record in an existing database, that was later retracted as faulty (breed does not exist). Do not use this term to obsolete a historic concept (that was once valid, but not anymore). @en | +
| 1 | +WARN | +missing_xrefs | +OMO:0001000 | +oboInOwl:hasDbXref | ++ |
| 2 | +WARN | +missing_xrefs | +OMO:0001001 | +oboInOwl:hasDbXref | ++ |
| 3 | +WARN | +missing_xrefs | +OMO:0001002 | +oboInOwl:hasDbXref | ++ |
| 4 | +WARN | +missing_xrefs | +OMO:0002000 | +oboInOwl:hasDbXref | ++ |
| 5 | +WARN | +missing_xrefs | +OMO:0003000 | +oboInOwl:hasDbXref | ++ |
| 6 | +WARN | +missing_xrefs | +OMO:0003001 | +oboInOwl:hasDbXref | ++ |
| 7 | +WARN | +missing_xrefs | +OMO:0003002 | +oboInOwl:hasDbXref | ++ |
| 8 | +WARN | +missing_xrefs | +OMO:0003003 | +oboInOwl:hasDbXref | ++ |
| 9 | +WARN | +missing_xrefs | +OMO:0003004 | +oboInOwl:hasDbXref | ++ |
| 10 | +WARN | +missing_xrefs | +OMO:0003005 | +oboInOwl:hasDbXref | ++ |
| 11 | +WARN | +missing_xrefs | +OMO:0003006 | +oboInOwl:hasDbXref | ++ |
| 12 | +WARN | +missing_xrefs | +OMO:0003007 | +oboInOwl:hasDbXref | ++ |
| 13 | +WARN | +missing_xrefs | +OMO:0003008 | +oboInOwl:hasDbXref | ++ |
| 14 | +WARN | +missing_xrefs | +OMO:0003009 | +oboInOwl:hasDbXref | ++ |
| 15 | +WARN | +missing_xrefs | +OMO:0003010 | +oboInOwl:hasDbXref | ++ |
| 16 | +WARN | +missing_xrefs | +OMO:0003011 | +oboInOwl:hasDbXref | ++ |
| 17 | +WARN | +missing_xrefs | +OMO:0003012 | +oboInOwl:hasDbXref | ++ |
| 18 | +WARN | +missing_xrefs | +OMO:0004000 | +oboInOwl:hasDbXref | ++ |