You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The initial planning is to use Github to develop and provide open science teaching/training materials since we want the materials to be reusable and adaptable. This can be easily established by Github, as initiatives as the Software Carpentry, the Data Carpentry or Mozilla Science Lab trainings have shown.
However, there were a couple of suggestions from people on the open science mailing list to also consider other platforms for provisioning (besides Github) and/or dissemination (besides the website) due to reasons of motivation/incentives for scientists and long-term preservation of the materials.
The initial planning is to use Github to develop and provide open science teaching/training materials since we want the materials to be reusable and adaptable. This can be easily established by Github, as initiatives as the Software Carpentry, the Data Carpentry or Mozilla Science Lab trainings have shown.
However, there were a couple of suggestions from people on the open science mailing list to also consider other platforms for provisioning (besides Github) and/or dissemination (besides the website) due to reasons of motivation/incentives for scientists and long-term preservation of the materials.
Platforms to consider/discuss:
The mailing list discussion can be followed here (first mail in the thread - please read the following ones).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: