Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

epo-acc:ESPDRequest the definition is wrong #734

Open
muricna opened this issue Jan 20, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

epo-acc:ESPDRequest the definition is wrong #734

muricna opened this issue Jan 20, 2025 · 2 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@muricna
Copy link
Collaborator

muricna commented Jan 20, 2025

The definition of the class is wrong it reads:

An updated self-declaration used by the economic operator as a preliminary evidence in replacement of certificates issued by public authorities or third parties confirming that the economic operator fulfils the Exclusion Grounds and the Selection Criteria set out by the Buyer for a specific Procurement.

The ESPD Request is the document provided by the Buyer including the Exclusion Grounds and Selectrion Criteria to be fulfilled by a Tenderer.

@andreea-pasare andreea-pasare self-assigned this Feb 11, 2025
@muricna
Copy link
Collaborator Author

muricna commented Feb 11, 2025

After discussions with the ESPD Team and DG GROW the suggested definitions for the ESPD Request and the ESPD are:

European Single Procurement Document Request (epo-acc-espd-request)

A document issued by a buyer defining how the Exclusion Grounds and the Selection Criteria should be addressed in a European Single Procurement Document for a specific procurement.

European Single Procurement Document (epo-sub-espd)

A self-declaration of an economic operator, stating that it does not fall under the Exclusion Grounds and that it meets the Selection Criteria for a specific procurement.

@andreea-pasare andreea-pasare added this to the 5.0.0 milestone Feb 11, 2025
@andreea-pasare
Copy link
Collaborator

The new definitions were added for ePO v5.0.0.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants