Clarification on Typographical Inconsistencies in Terminology #17
Unanswered
CyberVarun
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi,
I noticed some typographical inconsistencies in the terminology across the documentation, and I wanted to clarify the intended usage. Below are the cases I found, along with example images:
1. Device-Internal Elements vs. Device-External Elements:
Instances of "device-internal" and "device-external" appear with inconsistent hyphenation (e.g., "device-internal and device-external").
Example:
2. Digital In- and Outputs:
The term "digital in- and outputs" appears with this phrasing. Is this the intended style, or should it be "digital inputs and outputs"?
Example:
3. Hyphenation Usage in Internal and External:
Variations such as "device-internal and -external" vs. "device internal and device external" are used interchangeably.
Example:
4. Consistency Across Documentation:
Some documents use "device-internal and device-external" while others omit the hyphen (e.g., "device internal").
Example:
Could you confirm the correct and consistent terminology to ensure the documentation remains clear and professional?
Thanks!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions