You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Moreover "luxuries" with 90.2 is exactly the same value both sides, only it is not the average of: (78.0+102.0)/2 = 90.0
So I guess it should be one of:
78.4+102.0
78.3+102.1
78.2+102.2
78.1+102.3
78.0+102.4
But so far I haven't worked out where the calculation formula rounds it's interim results. E.g. looking at "narcotics" again, with price_economic = 0.00 and price_random = 1.00 I'd expect a range of
0.0 to 102.4 or
0.0 to 102.0 depending on the correct average, whereas the given values are
0.4 to 101.6 ???
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Apologies for taking so long to respond.
The next revision of the OoliteRS.pdf will have updated market information, which will be completely based on observable information in the game (compiled by jumping to every system and compiling the results). The difficulty with the trade-goods.plist info is that weighting and randomisation can skew the results.
https://github.com/OoliteProject/oolite/blob/master/Doc/OoliteRS.odt
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/OoliteProject/oolite/master/Resources/Config/trade-goods.plist
The following average prices diverge:
Moreover "luxuries" with 90.2 is exactly the same value both sides, only it is not the average of:
(78.0+102.0)/2 = 90.0
So I guess it should be one of:
But so far I haven't worked out where the calculation formula rounds it's interim results. E.g. looking at "narcotics" again, with
price_economic = 0.00
andprice_random = 1.00
I'd expect a range of0.0 to 102.4 or
0.0 to 102.0 depending on the correct average, whereas the given values are
0.4 to 101.6 ???
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: