You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
“Regarding the phrase ‘For instructions with clear ground truths’ mentioned in Section 3.1 of the article, I would like to know how the author evaluates whether the generated responses match the ground truth?” Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As stated in the original text, we force the model to output the final answer in the form of 'Final Answer: xxx' at the end. So for the final answer, we can match it with ground truth rules to determine if the answer is correct.
“Thank you for your response! Do you mean exact matching? However, the model’s output ‘final answer’ might have the same meaning but in different forms, such as 0.3 and 3/10, or ‘yes’ and ‘yep’. In cases like this, how do you handle the matching? Is there a script in the repository for this? (I couldn’t find it.)”
“Regarding the phrase ‘For instructions with clear ground truths’ mentioned in Section 3.1 of the article, I would like to know how the author evaluates whether the generated responses match the ground truth?” Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: