You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
I am using EPANET version 2.00.12 and 64 bit version of epanet.dll. I run the test.m file excluding the plot and input modification parts but it doesn't give the same results with solving the system with EPANET for example Network "Net1_Rossman2000" and "Net3_Rossman2000". The results comes same for network 2 but I can't understand why other ones don't. When I run the Test.m file for "Net1_Rossman2000" actual demand values for reservoir and tank are found to be different with the code and EPANET. Also pump operation times and heads are different. The system solves the network for 1 hr intervals however there are additional three mid-interval results. I thought it might be resulting from the controls of the system but when I erase the controls from the input file and solve with the EPANET still I did't get the same answers. Can you help me.
Thank you.
Ezgi KOKER
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
I am using EPANET version 2.00.12 and 64 bit version of epanet.dll. I run the test.m file excluding the plot and input modification parts but it doesn't give the same results with solving the system with EPANET for example Network "Net1_Rossman2000" and "Net3_Rossman2000". The results comes same for network 2 but I can't understand why other ones don't. When I run the Test.m file for "Net1_Rossman2000" actual demand values for reservoir and tank are found to be different with the code and EPANET. Also pump operation times and heads are different. The system solves the network for 1 hr intervals however there are additional three mid-interval results. I thought it might be resulting from the controls of the system but when I erase the controls from the input file and solve with the EPANET still I did't get the same answers. Can you help me.
Thank you.
Ezgi KOKER
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: