Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add option to skip huge triangles to to_raster_tin feature #43

Open
kannes opened this issue Jan 25, 2025 · 5 comments
Open

Add option to skip huge triangles to to_raster_tin feature #43

kannes opened this issue Jan 25, 2025 · 5 comments

Comments

@kannes
Copy link

kannes commented Jan 25, 2025

This is a feature request, coming from a QGIS user :)

My original feature request over at QGIS: qgis/QGIS#60113

It would be great if the to_raster_tin function had an option to "skip triangles bigger than ...". Then one could nicely rasterize data with islands in it. Currently one gets huge triangles connecting the islands.

Example

image

  • Cyan: My point cloud data points
  • Spectral: The exported raster

A result could look like this

image

@wonder-sk
Copy link
Collaborator

This will need support in PDAL first - there's a pending ticket for it: PDAL/PDAL#3924

@kannes
Copy link
Author

kannes commented Jan 27, 2025

Heh, thank you!


(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turtles_all_the_way_down#/media/File:River_terrapin.jpg)

@nicogodet
Copy link

PDAL/PDAL#4114 This PR as been merged and implement the missing feature ?

@wonder-sk
Copy link
Collaborator

PDAL/PDAL#4114 This PR as been merged and implement the missing feature ?

Hmm you're right... I have not tried it yet, and not sure why the original ticket is still open - worth testing it.

@hobu
Copy link
Member

hobu commented Feb 5, 2025

not sure why the original ticket is still open

The implementation wasn't quite complete, and maybe doesn't really work as was originally desired.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants