You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think the edition is closer to 1892 than 1882 and have adjusted the header and added a new link to the 1892 scan and an editorial note.
This has always been a sourcing question and I think that for a while only 1882 was online, so I went with that. Just found a verse issue that suggests 1892 is better but I'm stumped.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think the edition is closer to 1892 than 1882 and have adjusted the header and added a new link to the 1892 scan and an editorial note.
This has always been a sourcing question and I think that for a while only 1882 was online, so I went with that. Just found a verse issue that suggests 1892 is better but I'm stumped.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: