Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enabled Rabbit Streams by adding ability to expose additional ports #2234

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 6, 2025

Conversation

rrileyca
Copy link
Contributor

@rrileyca rrileyca commented Jan 31, 2025

This PR Adds the property embedded.rabbitmq.additionalPorts, which allows us to expose arbitrary port. If you enable the RabbitMQ Streams plugin, you can also expose the port 5552 to use for streams tests.

This is my first PR with this project. I hope I've followed the conventions.

Closes #2157

Copy link
Collaborator

@ijusti ijusti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks for contribution

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 3, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.96%. Comparing base (5250ee1) to head (3e34384).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop    #2234      +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage      79.89%   79.96%   +0.06%     
- Complexity       660      663       +3     
=============================================
  Files            199      199              
  Lines           3159     3169      +10     
  Branches         130      132       +2     
=============================================
+ Hits            2524     2534      +10     
  Misses           565      565              
  Partials          70       70              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@rrileyca
Copy link
Contributor Author

rrileyca commented Feb 5, 2025

Hi @ijusti , thanks for approving. It seems like one of the builds failed, and I don't have permission to re-run it. Can you give it a go? Thanks.

@ijusti
Copy link
Collaborator

ijusti commented Feb 6, 2025

Hi @ijusti , thanks for approving. It seems like one of the builds failed, and I don't have permission to re-run it. Can you give it a go? Thanks.

Tests were failed

@rrileyca
Copy link
Contributor Author

rrileyca commented Feb 6, 2025

They passed this time. I wonder if it was just an issue with the build system. Tests pass locally.

@ijusti ijusti merged commit 177c82e into PlaytikaOSS:develop Feb 6, 2025
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Ability to expose additional ports
2 participants